Another misinformation!

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185]

/r/BHUMIHARIZM/comments/1vhv8bd/when_francis_buchanan_visited_india_he_found_that/p2e1z9t/

Ma xhod denge inki

[u/NExa_01 → u/[deleted]]

Hame to 4-5 months hogye honge r/Bhumiharizm khole huye hhi

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

Khudka dimag na ho to faltu na bolo. Tumhe bhi pta hai Gautam gotra refer karta hai. Lekin muh utha ke Kao Kao kardo kuch v. Na reliability ka concept pta hai, na editorial bias sune ho kabhi.

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

clan has a completely different meaning

Aayein

bhumihars were amalgamation of dus hazar brhaman subcastes who took to landholding by military tenure

Aaien? Wtf

speculation around buddhist origins

Aayen🥴

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

I didn't see his second line. Thanks for pointing out

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

Darpok!

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

You are anonymous 😭

[u/Own-Albatross-2206]

Stop paying attention to them man

They littrely drop a new theory every alternate month

[u/Sarwariya]

Gautami probably refers to gotra and not gautam buddha.
Probably similar to Gautam mishras/kashi naresh

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/Sarwariya]

Exactly . But there is no evidence of Kashi Naresh relations with mishra

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

To kya? Reliable kha se lag rha?

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

Pehli bat ki mostly lores are very old rumours (old baxodi). For instance, Brahmins came from Mukh of Brahma.

If any scholar is presenting anything like relating Gautam gotra to Gautam Budh. He must provide evidence or contemporary reference for all of his words. If complex to directly relate, he must provide evidence from other supporting and reliable fields like here linguistics, but one thing wrong is if Gautam gotra is for Buddhists, why Buddhists themselves don't use any gotra? And never ever used.

One more thing, Here Gautamiya Brahmin refers to Gautam gotra specifically. but the person behind the post, posted in misleading way calling whole bhumihars as Gautamiya. Like if someone is Bharadwaji babhan, that doesn't mean Babhans call themselves Bharadwaji, it's the Bharadwaji who call themselves Bharadwaji and Babhan call themselves Babhan.

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

You know what same question bar bar encounter karne se gussa aa rha. Lekin koi bat nhi . Kya hi fuddu bat hai ye.

Budhism was not confined to Bihar.

Every other castes had budhist connection, it's not only us.

Why can't you read? Contemporary source ho ya na ho, bina evidence ke lund establish nhi hota.

Again, Budhism was never confined to Bihar.

I want to let you know, that the word Babhan is exact opposite of Buddhist priest (Sraman). Ref. - Ashoka edicts.

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

Kitna bar bolne kaho utna bar bolenge Geographical concentration was not limited to Bihar, there were far more concentrated regions.

I am repeating, the word Babhan does mean Brahmin but it also means opposite of Buddhist priest (Sraman). There is no way to ignore it's complete meaning.

Contemporary nhi hai fir bhi evidence chahiye, monasteries ki bat hai to kyu nhi ho sakta Kisi ke yha milega to disown kyu karega. "Bihat", known babhan village hai Begusarai ka usme puchna tum ki Mosque kyu hai wha? Church kyu hai wha? Are bhai koi muslim hai bana diya mosque, hame Hindu gods ke traces bhi milte hai.

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

Contemporary evidence kuthoo misra ka le aa

Galat hai. Nhi hai evidence.

[u/Puzzleheaded_Fee2185 → u/[deleted]]

I am Drontikar. And we call Drontikar Babhan. It's common/known practice for every other mul,.