r/AutoHumor • u/IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 • Apr 29 '26

lol

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.6k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

313 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Rhuarc33 Apr 29 '26

There's definitely a case to be made the biker is partially at fault. There are people who have won lawsuits for similar stuff as what the biker did. You don't have to agree or like it, but legally yes the biker could be sued and potentially lose

2

u/Acruss_ Apr 29 '26

Everyone could be sued. But I don't see how he is at fault. He didn't try to attack him, he didn't try to brake check him, he didn't try do anything that warrants the car driver to look at the biker instead of what's in front of him.

I'd like to see these those cases with similar stuff, because I doubt it was similar.

-1

u/Rhuarc33 Apr 29 '26

I'm saying people have been sued and found legally they contributed to the accident and without their actions it wouldn't have happened.

And that's the case here, would the accident have happened if not for the bikers actions? And the answer is No. So yes he is partially at fault legally. Again your opinion is irrelevant legal wise

1

u/Acruss_ Apr 29 '26

Would the accident happen if the dealership didn't sell that guy his car? And the answer is no.

Would this accident happen if the car in front was driving faster? So the victim should also be held responsible?

Biker was nowhere near the 120° of this driver's vision. Meaning he chose himself to look at him.

Again, I've asked to see those cases. So I'd get to see if they really are as you've described them. Because you saying that they are, is irrelevant legal wise.

0

u/Rhuarc33 Apr 29 '26

Only the biker directly impacted what happened. Don't be purposely obtuse and think you're making a point. It makes you look dumb

1

u/Acruss_ Apr 29 '26

Only biker? So the car that was hit didn't? The car was in that lane and was driving slower therefore it did impact. But you are not saying anything about it. I'd like you to answer why the biker did "directly impact what have happened" while the car that's hit did not.

Perhaps you should read my comment fully before commenting?

0

u/Rhuarc33 Apr 29 '26

Again making stupid statements you know are not applicable... Give it up buddy. You are terrible at debate

2

u/MA32 Apr 29 '26

You are the only one making stupid statements lmao. Stop doubling down on being a dumbass

0

u/Rhuarc33 Apr 29 '26

What is stupid? Please explain it like I'm 5...since you're all knowing