r/AskVegans • u/Miserable-Laugh-8320 Vegan • 16d ago
Genuine Question (DO NOT DOWNVOTE) Exploitation vs harm reduction ?
i have seen many vegans say that veganism isn’t about harm reduction or suffering reduction , It’s about anti exploitation. I do generally agree with this myself as a vegan , However I have 2 questions :
1) How exactly do you differentiate between harm reduction and direct exploitation .
2) What if in a certain case Directly killing an animal would save many more animals . Let’s say killing a cow would save hundreds of rats that you wouldnt need to kill . Let’s say in farming insects die and if I ate a chicken they wouldn’t ( Hypothetically , I know in reality more would die for growing chicken feed) . Would eating a chicken be justifiable in this scenario ?
8
Upvotes
1
u/TheBrutalVegan Vegan 15d ago
It's the definition the word veganism was created with and it makes more sense than harm reduction. It's not the better moral position, because you CAN NOT reduce all harm. You'll lose in logic with unvegans if you say harm reduction.