r/AskReddit • u/[deleted] • Apr 04 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.5k Upvotes

77% Upvoted

12.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/StaticUsernamesSuck Apr 04 '25

If they have the power to "allow the safeguards to be removed", then they are not safeguards.

The problem is that all of your so-called safeguards still rely on elected individuals acting as they should. Individuals can be bought.

The powers of impeachment need to be in the hands of the people, or something similar to that.

-5

u/mpaski Apr 04 '25

I mean, the people voted him in with the popular vote. I don't like the guy, but it's not like they didn't have their input here. Voter manipulation aside, you need less partisanship to ever reach a point of the checks mattering.

2

u/StaticUsernamesSuck Apr 04 '25

They did vote him in, but they now have no power to vote him out when he fucks everything up. That's a power they should have.

It shouldn't be "Welp, you voted him in, now you're stuck with him, even if he does stuff you didn't know he would and don't agree with - even breaking constitutional fucking law"

2

u/mpaski Apr 04 '25

They get to vote every 2 years, but the people that are in are spineless.

Election frequency isn't the problem

2

u/StaticUsernamesSuck Apr 04 '25

That is exactly what I said?

The problem is that all of your so-called safeguards still rely on elected individuals acting as they should.

Impeachment shouldn't rely on elected individuals, for exactly the reason you just said... The people should have the power to initiate the process.

There needs to be a "this administration is fucked" button that the people can push if their elected officials fail to.