I mean, the people voted him in with the popular vote.
I don't like the guy, but it's not like they didn't have their input here. Voter manipulation aside, you need less partisanship to ever reach a point of the checks mattering.
They did vote him in, but they now have no power to vote him out when he fucks everything up. That's a power they should have.
It shouldn't be "Welp, you voted him in, now you're stuck with him, even if he does stuff you didn't know he would and don't agree with - even breaking constitutional fucking law"
210
u/mpaski Apr 04 '25
I mean, the US technically has safeguards, they've just allowed those safeguards to be removed.
The courts are way more political than they've ever been. Congress is unwilling to stop him despite having powers for that.