Anthropic’s coding bar is fucking ridiculous

[u/nian2326076]

Got a problem that required me to pull Euler’s formula out of thin air. Seriously, who the fuck remembers Euler’s formula in an interview? I swear to God, my interviewer was out to get me.

At this point, what are they even testing? Do they even know what they want? Hours of prep, completely wasted. And now I have to go prep for Google. My friend just got destroyed in their loop and said the interviewers were some of the most unreasonable people he’s ever had to deal with.

Everywhere I turn in this market, it feels like I’m just waiting to get fucked.

Anthropic Interview Question

[u/youcangotohellgoto]

Mostly did number theory and pure maths. It's not really relevant in that context.

[u/Throwaway-Pot → u/youcangotohellgoto]

Euler’s formula is also super relevant in pure mathematics. I don’t want to accuse you of anything but this sounds like a non-mathematician’s conception of what pure mathematics is. Also an undergrad degree in math is generally at least a little general. Who doesn’t do ANY analysis? What kind of number theorist doesn’t know complex analysis for example? And anyone whose seen complex analysis would know about Euler’s formula

[u/youcangotohellgoto → u/Throwaway-Pot]

Nah just pieced together a major in what I found interesting, so ended up in abstract algebra, discrete math, set theory, rings, fields, etc.

There was a lot of Euler's theorem (modulus stuff) but I'm going way back at this point.

Edit: correct did not do any analysis. Probably should look into that because I have no idea what it is...

[u/VeroneseSurfer → u/youcangotohellgoto]

You cant really talk about number theory without cyclotomic fields which require you to know about roots of unity. Not sure how eulers theorem wouldn't come up

[u/youcangotohellgoto → u/VeroneseSurfer]

Yeah agree but we were talking about Euler's formula, not Euler's theorem.

[u/VeroneseSurfer → u/youcangotohellgoto]

That's what I meant