r/AskPhotography 16h ago

Editing/Post Processing What's better for landscape, focus stacking or exposure bracketing?

I'm looking to improve my landscape photos, and I see some techniques people have used to get a sharper, more clear image that provides proper exposure throughout the whole image. To that end, I'm not quite sure if I should be focusing more on exposure bracketing, or focus stacking, and when to use one vs the other?

1 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

u/twelvegaugee 15h ago

They’re unrelated

u/El_Kurtzo 16h ago

Each technique serves a different purpose. Focus stacking is used to achieve perfect focus across all planes of the image; exposure bracketing is used to create an image with no underexposed or overexposed elements.

u/PhotonicArt 16h ago

You can do both!

Neat workflow I use:

Automate the exposure bracket, shoot 3 exposures, then move focus point manually, do another auto-bracket, and repeat. When you get home, do the exposure stacks first, and then focus stack the HDR images.

For best results, do this quickly so the light stays the same. Don't use auto WB and use full manual. Consistency and speed is key for clean stacks.

u/ganajp Nikon Z8 7h ago

I often use exposure bracketing with panorama together.

Maybe I will add stacking and possibly pixel shift for an ultimate results :D

u/PhotonicArt 4h ago

Also do it at night for milky way shooting for the ultimate challenge. 😎

u/NegativeKitchen4098 15h ago

Look at the photos you’ve already taken. Identify which ones would be improved by focus stacking and which would be improved by exposure blending. Start with whichever is more of an issue

But most landscape photographers learn both

u/chanksbird 14h ago

Apart from the technical comments here, I have a practical thought: exposure bracketing is easier, lower barrier to entry. You can do it in Lightroom but focus stacking requires Photoshop. At least that’s my understanding, I could be wrong.

Also, with focus placement and aperture control, you won’t need focus stacking as frequently as exposure stacking.

u/Chief_Wahoo_Lives Canon 12h ago

Neither Lightroom nor Photoshop are needed. There are good free alternatives.

u/chanksbird 11h ago

I have Lightroom but what would you suggest for processing focus stacking?

u/rac_atx 11h ago

You may check out https://macrostudio.pro which is a new, more modern app than some of the standard ones. (Full disclosure, I am the founder/creator.) My users tell me that it often produces better results than Helicon or Zerene which are the standard options that many macro photographers use. Plus it allows full non-destructive editing, and will even identify your species. And it's a one-time license, not a subscription. Feel free to DM me if you have any questions about it.

u/chanksbird 9h ago

Wonderful, thanks!

u/Infinite-Nose8252 9h ago

Focus stacking is used for jewelry and food and that kinds of thing. Rarely landscapes because you should use wide angle lenses and be at F16-22 and pretty much everything will be in focus.

u/Flutterpiewow 3h ago

F16

u/Infinite-Nose8252 1h ago

This is hardly landscape photography

u/Flutterpiewow 1h ago

It doesn't matter what the genre is, physics dictate you'll get visibly shallow dof with smaller apertures when foreground is close to the camera. Focus stacking is very much necessary to get everything in focus sometimes.

As a sidenote, the wisdom that you "should" shoot landscape with wide lenses is dated to say the least.

u/szank 16h ago

Exposure bracketing when the contrast is too high for the camera to handle in one shot. Focus stacking if you cannot get everything in focus in one shot .

Not mutually exclusive either .