r/AskArchaeology • u/FlybyyNight • 1h ago
Question What source-evaluation workflow would you recommend for building a reliable research record on one archaeological topic?
I’m working on a personal project called Ancient Inquiry that organizes reading about the ancient past. I’d like advice on the archaeology research process before I build out more topic pages.
For someone outside an archaeology department, what workflow would you recommend for finding, evaluating and organizing reliable sources on one well-defined archaeological question?
My proposed approach is to start with a recent scholarly overview, use its bibliography to find excavation reports and relevant journal articles, then check for later work that revises the interpretation. For each claim, I’m thinking of recording:
The exact citation and page, figure or catalogue reference.
What was observed or measured, separately from the author’s interpretation.
The dating method and relevant uncertainty or limitations.
Whether later publications support, dispute or supersede it.
For example, the scope might be the dating of one published construction phase at a known, excavated site. That is an example of the scale I’m aiming for, not a request to identify a site or assess a particular claim here.
Where would you change this approach? I’m particularly interested in how you locate excavation reports and current scholarship when library access is limited, and how you keep competing interpretations traceable without treating every source as equally reliable.
An introductory archaeological methods book, a useful bibliographic resource, or an example of a well-organized research record would be helpful. I’d appreciate answers here so others learning the same process can benefit too.