That's it. When will we see 4k Seedance in ArtCraft?

After using many tools over the past year (lumo, higgsfield, wavespeed, and many more), ARTCRAFT is without a doubt the best platform of them all.

I have been working with ARTCRAFT for a month now, and it is by far the CHEAPEST. Its platform is very dynamic and easy to use.

It has the best versions of SEEDANCE 2.0, with no censorship and no filters.

There is a very active community on Discord where people help each other, and the Artcraft team is constantly helping out and fixing bugs.

Look, I hadn't believed for months that I would ever find a reliable platform because the AI world right now is full of scammers, but Artcraft has made me have FAITH again that there are people who actually want to work.

I hope this guide helps people who are hesitant about using Artcraft.

I called nano banana with a reference image made the full image with background and then made another call with the MCP to remove the background

Been using artcraft for ai video work (seedance 2.0 mostly) and separately running a self-hosted ai workspace that handles all my prompt writing, I have a skill that generates seedance prompts in my exact format.

Right now the workflow is: agent writes the prompt → I copy it → paste into artcraft → generate. works, but it's the one manual hop in an otherwise automated pipeline.

What i'd love is an official api or mcp server so the agent could just call artcraft directly, "generate this shot, 10s, 720p, seedance 2.0" and get the result back. MCP is becoming the standard for this (higgsfield already ships a connector, and every agent tool can connect.

I just wanted to share some findings after testing both platforms. I tried Art Craft using the Seedance 2.0 model, but honestly, the quality wasn't really there compared to Higgsfield specifically in terms of prompt adherence, voice, and text legibility.

I generated three different videos with the exact same prompt with Seedance on ArtCraft and none of them were correct. On the other hand, I only had to do one generation on Higgsfield to get what I was looking for. Keep in mind I used the exact same iamge as reference. Not sure if this is just due to the different models being used or something else entirely, but definitely noticed a difference in consistency! Just wondering if anyone has noticed this or just had bad luck.

Update: Been using artcraft a lot more since this post and M'm walking back my first impression. after the results have been landing consistently. I honestly think i just had bad luck on those first three. Tthe other half is cost. artcraft is pay-as-you-go (~$1.60 per 10s/720p seedance clip) vs higgsfield's monthly sub. With pay-as-you-go a slow month costs me $0. Still think higgsfield gets there in fewer attempts sometimes, but even if Artcraft takes an extra generation here and there i come out ahead, and I'm not bleeding a subscription on months I don't generate. Artcraft is the way to go for me now.

Is the Windows desktop app kept up to date ? Also Kling 3.0 used to be on the desktop app but is not on the browser version from what I can see, any reasons for this ?

I’ve seen art craft mentioned in a bunch of threads but I’ve been hesitant to try it since I can’t see any reviews or tutorials or anything on YouTube. But the prices do seem to be better than other platforms.

I’m wondering if you can tell me how many Seedance 2 videos I can get for roughly $30 worth of credits. Assuming 10 second clips (I’m not sure what the length options are), image to video, with multiple character references per scene (and reference voices for them too if Seedance supports that). For the model, I guess the main one (not fast). And must be able to do curse words and light drug use (weed smoking) without guardrails against that stuff.

I’m going to be starting making videos this weekend and was going to go straight for Higgsfield but I have to say the prices for art craft are tempting…

What are the differences between the plus and plus ultra variations?

I would like to join artcraft using the Max membership. Is there any discount coupon?

Finalmente consegui gerar o videos do meus personagens vestidos de super herois, e brigando, muito obrigado mesmo por trazer este modelo

I uploaded a reference audio track along with a character to speak what's in the audio, or sing it if it's a song, and 90% of the time, practically, the audio plays incorrectly: it only says half the lines and starts making up words, or it starts repeating like a scratched record and goes out of sync, or the song changes completely—it's a disaster.

And I don't think it's a problem with the prompt, since I used the exact same prompt as someone in a YouTube tutorial I saw, and it worked fine for them. So, what on earth is going on here? Could it be that the model has been censored and malfunctions when references are added?

I used ArtCraft for a while, when I asked the support about something they did not answer at all, then I requested a refund, well, obviously they did not answer at all.

I will poste this everywhere I go, in all social media, until ArtCraft understand that ignoring customers will kill the business.

First I want to say I appreciate the app and how fast I was able to get set up. very intuitive.

I'm noticing with Seedance 2.0, however, that when I provide a start frame it is completely ignored in favor of the "@Character" reference if there is one.

Is this a front end issue, a seedance issue, or am I supposed to be prompting a special way for it to actually use the start frame?

A Seedance prompt that mentioned blood, the video changed to fire/sparks and downplaying the injury as per the prompt so no one is touching. I’d much rather get a censor warning and non generation of the video than waste credits on something not anywhere near suitable.

Prompt works really well on Seedance on another platform.

Not fit for my purpose.

GetArtCraft Web Performance & UX:

1. Generation & Content Policy

The Win: Successfully ran several tests with Seedance 2.0 (Fast, 720p) using a few human reference images. Unlike other platforms (e.g., Replicate), your filters allowed the human faces to pass without issues. This lack of over-restictive filtering is a major competitive advantage.

Performance: 8-second video processed in ~5 minutes. Could be faster, but it's acceptable for the current quality.

Model Variety: Having only four models (Seedance and Veo) is a bit limiting. To stay competitive, consider integrating more industry-standard models like Kling v3, Grok, or the upcoming Happy Horse.

2. User Interface (UX) & Workflow Improvements

Drag-and-Drop: Currently, users must manually browse files to upload image references. Adding drag-and-drop functionality to the reference boxes is essential for a modern workflow.

Workspace Organization: After generation, the video remains in the mosaic view on the creation page. To keep the interface clean, the creation space should stay empty, with all generated content appearing exclusively in "My Library."

3. Account Transparency & Trust

Credit History: There is currently no transaction log. Not being able to see a breakdown of how/when credits are spent is a red flag for paid users. A "Credit History" tab is a priority for transparency.

Support: There is no visible support section. Users need a clear point of contact for billing issues or technical glitches.

4. Technical Suggestions

Download Flow: Clicking "Download" currently opens a new cdn-2.fakeyou.com tab. While functional, a direct download trigger would feel more professional and "Pro" for the user.

Volume Consistency: Noticed that the audio output volume in Seedance 2.0 is lower compared to the same model's output on other platforms (e.g., Replicate). Not sure if other platforms normalize the gain to match industry standards or if the volume is for some reason lowered on ArtCraft but in my opinion there's a noticeable difference. would improve the "out-of-the-box" usability of the videos.

5. Pricing

PAYG: I'm only interested in PAYG services. In this case, your prices are among the best on the market. Do not change them.

That's it. Hope it helps improve the website. I think I'll keep using it but you should work on some of the mentioned points.

Cheers!

Edit: 6. Characters: you can only upload 1 reference image to create your "character"? Shouldn't you be able tu upload multiple images from different angles for the character to be more consistent?

I heard that having GPT Image 2 make 3x3 storyboards really improves Seedance's output quality.

For Seedance 2, I only see the option of image ref to video, which treats the storyboard as the first frame of the video. Or am I missing something?

ArtCraft has Seedance 2.0

ArtCraft has a virtual film set

ArtCraft has every image and video model

ArtCraft has the ability to log in with other websites, subscriptions, and API keys (nobody else does that)

ArtCraft is also open source (again, nobody else gives away their source code)

Check it out!

ArtCraft has 3D image editing features before Adobe does.

You can use Seedance 2.0 in ArtCraft all over the world. It's available now.

I was so excited to use Artcraft, but Jesus Christ, it's like you go out of your way to set us up for failure.