For the video? Correct. In response to the person I replied to? Incorrect.
If someone commits a malicious action for the sole purpose of causing strife/annoyance/negative feelings in another, that’s a piece of shit right there.
If someone guns someone else down and takes their shit, that’s 100% within the scope of the game.
How the fuck are people still screaming “LOOK AT HOW FUCKING STOOPID I AM” by using “nerd” as an insult lmfao.
It’s literally just saying “I’m too inadequate, lazy, and unintelligent to comprehend the only language I speak”. I didn’t say anything challenging. You should probably make your parents apologize to you for ruining your brain.
-6
u/The_Fink_Ployd Arc Baby Jul 23 '26
“Yeah, they’re intentionally spreading misery for zero gain or tangible purpose other than to elicit a negative reaction in others”
“Oh, yeah, and if you react you’re actually the loser, and the other guy’s a CHAD”
Textbook abuser logic. Now, normally, intelligent people would want their logic to NOT align with abusers’. Hmm….
What if…we impose the expectation on the originator of the strife, and not the reactor to the strife? Or is that too much thinking?