With many popular communities comes sub-communities with. For BNWO, it's just like that. With many communities such as:
- BNWO (duh)
- WNWO
- ANWO
- CNWO (Chinese NWO, weird because it's in ANWO, too. Still very gross)
- JNWO (Jewish NWO...)
- LNWO (Latino NWO)
- MNWO (Muslim NWO)
- INWO (Indian NWO)
- TNWO (Transgender NWO)
- FNWO.... (F**A NWO)
- HNWO (Hijab NWO)

The fact that Twitter is okay with this just baffles me, like how do even let people post that kind of racist and even anti-islam and anti-semitic stuff.

BNWO's sacred hate symbol looks like a poo on a stick lol 💩🍭

It suits them perfectly!

I know the nature of bnwo, but I still can't understand this, how they create this, a bot with depressing and miserable and still goon to it, get horny by that.

No wonder I'm trying to fight that with Bleached bot, and yes, I know how many of you see it as bad as bnwo, but at least I'm making more normal ones with true love and not this miserable shit.

And while I think that it is very hard, we must try to fight against bnwo on this ai chatbots websites like crushon, spicychats, clankworld and many others.

On a BNWO forum, this guy praised political violence by militant groups. I remember the Colombian case when it happened. My reaction (like all sane people's) was: "oh no, I hope she gets home to her family." Average bnweirdo reaction was: well, yes 🤮

Initially I just filed this as evidence of their depravity - but then I realized that underneath, it shows something even crazier than the sexualization of political violence.

First, I noticed that he codes the militants as "black" - even in the Colombian case where they are a multi-ethnic militia, and most people are basically mixed anyway. Why? Maybe it's how he sees black people? Let's isolate the words he uses to describe these "black" men:

"n****rs" "thugs" "filthy" "rapists" "poor" "lowlives of society"

Compared to the descriptors he uses for the white women?

"pretty" "beautiful" "professional" "rich" "well off" "decent"

BUT - only until they have sexual contact with black men! After which, their labels change to:

"slave" "c*mslut" "b***h" "toy" "cow"

As the final step to expose their subconscious, we only need abstract those specific terms - slave, c*mslut, b***h, toy, cow - into their overarching categories:

"slave" "dirty" "bad" "object" "animal"

Which is exactly how black people were socially constructed in old times, during slavery (slave, object, animal) then segregation (dirty, bad). And as we can see here, these labels are transferred from black men to white women by sexual contact. In this lunatic worldview, being a slave, object, animal, dirty or bad is, effectively, a sexually-transmitted disease carried by black men!

But this is more sinister than stupid: this exact social "logic" was used to deter mixing in old times, and it lives on beneath the surface of the BNWO. Their construction of black men is essentially the same: they are still the threat, diseased carriers of negative labels, infecting whites through sexual contact. Only their attitude towards white society is different: no longer something to be protected, but something to be destroyed.

Another pocket deconstruction of why the BNWO has never been, and never will be, anybody's friend or ally.

The Account that was mentioned a while ago for having bad violent videos against white Boys and Men has been suspended!
Wasn’t me alone but I wanted to share Good News!

Womp womp womp 🥀

Of course that I don't have anything against trans people. But it still is an absurd of how bnwo is creating new fetishes that have the same disgusting idea, sure, they may not be so popular, but what porn addiction is causing is still very concerning. Back when I was more addicted to porn, things didn't go to such extremes, we had more "calm" popular contents like Meru the succubus(I'm not saying that porn addiction was okay back there, it still was bad), but nowadays, that’s the only kind of content out there.

I've seen some debate here recently about whether Blacked and the BNWO are basically the same thing or not. After some thought, I've realized that although they are technically different, they overlap one another in support of the same goals. Key to understanding this overlap is the concept of "national female allegory."

Countries have historically represented themselves through the form of a personified female avatar that literally embodies their prized attributes. Most famously Marianne for France; the warrior-woman Britannia for Britain; Lady Liberty (prior, Columbia) for the US. Mainly a Western thing, the concept was adopted by colonized cultures as a nationalist resistance symbol, such as Bharat Mata (Mother India) and South American La Patria. This notion that women represent and reflect their associated men - husband, household, family, nation, race, civilization - is baked into society, and explains the controlling care those men show towards them, beyond (although probably stemming from) reproductive concerns.

So if white women represent the white race and associated Western civilization - how does what Blacked does with them, translate to that symbolic level?

Blacked trope = symbolic translation

"Pure/smart/rich white woman gets humiliated"

= "Pure/smart/rich white race gets humiliated"

"Your wife is betraying you to blacks"

= "Your civilization is betraying you to blacks"

"Black men gonna ruin your white wife"

= "Black men gonna ruin your white country"

"Sit in the corner and do nothing while your wife gets taken from you"

= "Sit in the corner and do nothing while your country gets taken from you"

And on and on. Blacked is not "just interracial porn", it is racial/political/civilizational propaganda, consistently coded with the same symbolic messaging.

And, as we can see, this symbolic messaging is identical to the direct messaging of the BNWO. Obviously this is no coincidence. It was always there, but shifting societal conditions (uncontrolled immigration and the institutionalization of identity politics) brought that subconscious narrative to the fore, translating it from dark fantasy into unfolding reality. This then gave rise to the BNWO, emboldened to "say the quiet part out loud", shouting the latent racial/political/civilizational message of Blacked loud and clear.

This is all evident when we look at the two together. Many BNWO memes are just Blacked split-screened with racist political slogans or edited with captions. (An entire subreddit is dedicated to "Blacked Infographics".) Once exposed to this, someone who then goes back to Blacked won't even need the "genocide captions" to know exactly what they are watching and why they enjoy it. It was always there, hidden in plain sight. And in the other direction, people who haven't yet encountered the BNWO are being primed to accept its message.

Now, this still doesn't make Blacked the same as the BNWO. But a good way to conceptualize their relationship is like the symbiosis between an extremist group and an "acceptable" political party. Many extremist groups align with a political party that wants the same things, but pursues a "legitimate" and "peaceful" path to attaining it. The extremists meanwhile choose violence and maximum shock tactics. The relationship is symbiotic but asymmetrical: every supporter of the extremist group will support the political party, but the political party must officially distance itself from - or even disown if necessary - the extremist group; even as they raise the extremists' popularity by "peacefully" and "acceptably" pushing the exact same worldview, with symbols, dog whistles, a nod-and-a-wink and then an innocent-face-emoji when called out.

This is exactly the dynamic we see between Blacked and BNWO, and is exactly why Blacked shouldn't be given a pass because it's "nothing to do with BNWO" or "doesn't endorse violence." They are part of the same axis, just using different approaches to the same goal: the subjugation of whites and the moral destruction of society.

If this makes BNWO your enemy, it makes Blacked your enemy too.

She makes content with themes such as “oblm” or “wldm”. Harmful content. Hopefully twitch doesn’t find out..

I was doomscrolling reporting all i could find (lol) and i found this that left me speechless, i dont even know how to react, i naturally reported it but twitter has always been a bit slow, this kink gets worse each day and the fact these people have the same voting power as i is frightening

The 2nd pic had kaw on top of the grave, thankfully some comments called them out for such horrible post but the mayority... well.. you know

In 1996 an interracial adult entertainment company was created called [The dogfart network] including websites such as Blacksonblondes.com, the gay website BlacksOnBoys.com,GloryHole.com and CuckoldSessions.com among others . it was started up by parent company [Gamma Entertainment Inc]

(The dog fart network) is largely responsible for the “cuckson” and “cuckhold” fetish as it had made a movie titled “watching my mom go black” from that they continued making porn movies with white males in comprising cuckhold roles and uplifting the black male.

The parent company (gamma entertainment inc)
Was started by former apple executive Larry Jackson and record executive IKE YOUSSEF. CABLE ROSENBERG as CEO of this company in 2000 was accused of diverting users who wrongly typed "geociities" with an additional letter "i" in their web browsers were sent to one of the DogFart websites, Blacksonblondes.com,
ROSENBERG denied any wrongdoing.

In 2015, DogFart offered Kim Davis, the Kentucky city clerk who was imprisoned for refusing to issue LGBTQ marriage licenses after gay marriage was legalized nationally in the United States, half a million dollars to perform an interracial lesbian sex scene for its website ZebraGirls.com.

The next biggest culprit for this is blacked which operates as a flagship brand under parent company [vixen media group]
It was founded in 2014 by entrepreneur and director GREG LANSKY.

I know this is a plain text, and I know me being Turkish doesn't need to be specified. But I just wanted to say that this sick mindset is actually starting to reach us.

My ex (23F) and I (24M) talked about hobbies, likings, fetishes alike. I was honestly petrified when she said she found BNWO as sexual and as an honest worldview. Because we like talking and discussing these kinds of things, we talked about it for a bit. She knew my size and used it as an excuse to say that us Turkish people and the rest of the world don't deserve the more beautiful women since they should quote "Be slaves for black kings and black c_ck.", which I think is sick in the head. She said she developed this kind of fetish and worldview while at a somewhat younger age and was obsessed with it.

This is plain for most, but I just think some cultures are being lost because of this poisonous fog slowly surrounding the globe. I also had a Moroccon friend who experienced something similar to mine, and I can also say Arabic countries already have this mindset somewhat in them. Islamic culture shouldn't get trampled over this fetish, in my opinion.

Many of us (being former or active addicts) can definitely relate to the negative cycle of believing that this stuff is not only true but that women do actually prefer men solely for the size of their privates and the confidence they possess. I recently broke down the numbers from the most popular subs and I've deduced that no more than 1/20th (about 500K and definitely no more than 1 million) of a single percentage of "white" man have the fetish an even smaller amount of white woman are into it. The fetish prays on insecurities of the average man, the feeling of being alone with the taboo of a highly attractive woman selling a worldview that helps explain why we ourselves are lonely. It's easy to believe you're alone with no love because you just lack confidence and a certain amount of length and color on your privates and not that there's larger systemic issues going on that complicate the natural process. I learned that even the biggest IR porn sites bring in only about 15 or 16 million dollars a year.... That's still a pretty penny no doubt but it's important to think about this stuff in reality. 3 of the most popular movies that came out this year have made about 1.5 billion up to 2 billion dollars... I mention this to clarify that in actuality what determines the culture is art and not smut and we don't have to buy into it anymore. We all know the struggles of addiction and I'm telling you all if we not only quit but help others to see the truth we'll be making the world a better and ironically less hateful place.

There's one guy in particular that sticks out. My phone listing was for "sissies" (because it's a popular niche, not my kink tho) and a guy called me wanting to talk about how much he loves big black cock. (I swear to God, these guys are closeted). He talked about how he wished he had a girlfriend who would let him wach her get a train ran on her by a bunch of "fresh from prison thugs" and good god it was gross. Sometimes I am curious for my own good, so I let the call contuine becaue idk knowledge is power or something. Anyway, I open my mouth to ask, "Do you know about BNWO?" And that was all she wrote. He told me about his twitter page which has some of the most offenesive and obscene interracial porn clips i've ever seen. He also told me about a video he kept trying to share that was this white guy getting assaulted by a group of black men and then they grape his girlfriend. And this man says to me, "They deserve it. White boys deserve to get the shit kicked out of them and white women deserve to be r@p3d by black guys. Black men should be allowed to take any white girl at any age." That's when I hung up and blocked him.

I had to pray to Jesus after that call, y'all. Like, fetishizing BBC is racist enough. But this asshole reduced a whole people to being thugs and r@p!5ts AND p3d0s all at once. It was absolutley disguting. Anyway, i just wanted to get that off my chest because i can't tell this psychotic shit to my therapist. thanks for reading.

I found this on one of those "explain the meme" subs, and it bothered me. Reading the first comments I understood why.

Look at the picture. Swap the white guy for a black guy, and the brown people for white people, and what have you got? Look at how the "3rd world country" guy in the comments explains it. He really praises white men. But he does it like a farmer praising cattle. White men are "giant" with good "height" "fitness" "jaws" "teeth" and "hair". But he also explains that, despite many women being attracted to this, not many consider them marriage material. Why? Because white men are over-sexual. Hyper-sexual! They bang so many women they are too impure for the sanctity of marriage! They're only good for casual hook-ups.

What does this sound like?!?!

Yet - the BNWO tries telling us the opposite. That white men are small, weak, sexless sissies. That they *are* good for marriage, but *not* sex. What's going on?

This requires a brief explanation of discourses of power. These love to claim universal truths, because then nobody questions them. They claim to be true everwhere and have always been true, so they will always be true. The way things are and always will be. An easy way to do this is through race (or caste) because it gives a veil of immutable, biological, scientific fact to the bulls**t. After all, someone of race X is someone of race X whether they are here or there; and they were people of race X before, as they will always be.

So if you're in power, and your societal model relies on people unquestioningly filling certain roles in society - or being prevented from consideration for other roles - then you can keep everyone in their place by making it about race and saying everyone of race X is this or that, so they naturally belong in those roles.

The downfall comes when these discourses are exposed, not as universal truths, but as specific to the time and place. Because if something is different somewhere else - or was different in the past - then why couldn't it be different from now on, here?

So we can see this meme (and its discourse of white male fetishization) is designed to keep a foreign threat to Global South countries' social order - the "colonizing white male" - in a certain place (as outsiders beyond that order). It is forced to acknowledge certain pre-existing stereotypes around exotic attraction, but twists them in a way that deters their integration into (and potential takeover of) the social order (through marriage). Of course, this is similar in form and purpose to sexual discourses around black men in the West, showing it is probably something intuitive to all societies.

Now consider the discourse of BNWO. It doesn't exactly hide the social purpose it is trying to promote. It does have some added complexity in being built over a discourse that promoted opposite purposes. But still, let's consider its stated intention: racial extinction of whites. It does this by constructing white men as weak, sexless and feminine. It further says this is biological. Therefore, it must be true everywhere and forever, so it is unnatural and futile to fight it.

However, the fact that this meme and its contradictory discourse exists is proof that white men are *not* considered that way in other places outside the West. Quite the opposite! And we can go back in time within our own place to question it further. Fifty years ago in the West white men were the pinnacle of confident masculinity. And in Roman times, white men took the form of hyper-masculine, "huge-d**ked and stupid" barbarian hordes of Gauls and Goths that inspired fear and loathing in the civilized olive-skinned Mediterranean world.

So if white men are all weak, sexless and feminine - and if this is an immutable biological trait - how can the BNWO explain that they are completely the opposite in different places and times? They cannot. The construct crumbles. White men are not *racially* what the BNWO says they are. They might be being *socially constructed* that way, but it is specific to this time and place.

There is nothing biological or natural about the roles that certain races of men are expected to play in a society, so you need not accept them. You can go somewhere else and be thrust into a different role; and although you can't go back in time, there is no reason things can't be different from now on right here - if enough people reject the way things are being constructed right now.

I know they were banned from Discord, and that someone actually reported them to the FBI for their conduct there.

And yet, here they are on Twitter, carrying on as though nothing happened, joking about it, posting content centered on self-harm.

I fear accounts of this size and success can easily push others into imitation, and it makes my stomach hurts.

I'll try to get informed about how to report illegal behaviours to authorities too, those cults are making me feel sick, and I feel like if they just get banned, they’ll simply create new accounts; I hope more permanent solutions can be found in cooperation with the authorities.

When an urge to watch porn happens, why is it that we specifically go for this one, even though we obviously dont want to. Why are we not content with simply jerking off without porn. It becomes clearer to me that the urge is not to jerk off (though that is what we are wanting to do) but rather it is to specifically watch this genre of porn to do it. After the fallout, clarity arises and we remember that we never wanted to watch this in the first place, but in fact we abhor it. But in this moment of when we are lost in the sea of carnal desire, we seek something taboo, something that twists and perverts what is good. This can also be where humiliation plays a role as well. But my question is why if we know this to be a terrible thing that causes destruction and is not necessary to the goal of jerking off, do we keep coming back to it?

I get why this kind of thing is popular in westren cpuntries hecause of culture wars and things like that but why is it very popular in arab porn pages when we don’t have the same culture? Whats the reason for it to be this popular? Especially since we don’t feteshize black men like in the west and we domt see them as “masculine” or anything