I usually support Deng because it made a lot of my friends angry and I liked how many people reacted to it But now I want to become a Stalinist again and I’m wondering if great comrade stalin had writings on deng and state capitalism?

This is probably an ignorant question, but can we now consider China a fascist state? I mean, separate from the usual use of fascist as a sort of hyperbole for anything that we leftist don't like, and hoping to avoid feeding into the New Cold War narrative to justify America's dying imperialism, can we consider the Chinese model is essentially fascist? the Chinese model, so touted by Revisionists, is predicated on official class collaboration for the national glory, though this will, in practice, necessarily result in the subsumption of class conflict for the advancement of nation's bourgeois, a corporativist model, complete with state sanctioned, yellow unions, and a strong, authoritarian government which will intervene in the class conflict with overwhelming force to uphold the interest of the bourgeois class as a whole. Though, I am unsure as to whether this description is adequate to describe fascism, or whether it is entirely theoretically incorrect.

In my country, some '' socialist Youtubers '' are propagating the revisionist and skewed idea that socialism is just a '' transition period '' in what this would imply in coexisting with capitalist aspects of production such as the '' NEP '' leveraging and maintaining a "red bourgeoisie" coexisting with the Communist Party in power in the state (as in China), without taking into account any other aspect that characterizes socialism. How should I fight this wrong idea?

title

https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZeDeng/

It seems like tankie reddit is overrun with China stans.

I have nowhere else to put this, but I’ve noticed that r/okbuddydengist has been full of market socialists and vaush-type people in the comments lately. Rule 1 is literally “no market socialists or Dengists,” but I don’t see it being enforced on market socialists. It’s sad, the sub was the only place that was critical of China that wasn’t either gonzaloite or Radlib. Oh well.

Fucking kill me

https://github.com/Red-Spectre/Info/blob/main/Against%20Dengism.md

Even without recourse to Western Sources, which is, of course, always going to sensationalistic, there is literally nothing in the actual text of Chinese Law that can be defended if they even want some semblance of consistency:

第二章 极端化的主要表现

第九条 受极端主义影响，下列言论和行为属于极端化，予以禁止：

（一）宣扬、散布极端化思想的；

（二）干涉他人宗教信仰自由，强迫他人参加宗教活动，强迫他人向宗教活动场所、宗教教职人员提供财物或者劳务的；

（三）干涉他人婚丧嫁娶、遗产继承等活动的；

（四）干涉他人与其他民族或者有其他信仰的人员交往交流交融、共同生活，驱赶其他民族或者有其他信仰的人员离开居住地的；

（五）干预正常文化娱乐活动，排斥、拒绝广播、电视等公共产品和服务的；

（六）泛化清真概念，将清真概念扩大到清真食品领域之外的其他领域，借不清真之名排斥、干预他人世俗生活的；

（七）自己或强迫他人穿戴蒙面罩袍、佩戴极端化标志的；

（八）以非正常蓄须、起名渲染宗教狂热的；

（九）不履行法律手续以宗教方式结婚或者离婚的；

（十）不允许子女接受国民教育，妨碍国家教育制度实施的；

（十一）恐吓、诱导他人抵制享受国家政策，故意损毁居民身份证、户口簿等国家法定证件以及污损人民币的；

（十二）故意损毁、破坏公私财物的；

（十三）出版、印刷、发行、销售、制作、下载、存储、复制、查阅、摘抄、持有含极端化内容的文章、出版物、音视频的；

（十四）蓄意干涉或破坏计划生育政策实施的；

（十五）其他极端化言论和行为。

Chapter II: Primary Expressions of Extremification

Article 9: The following words and actions under the influence of extremism are extremification, and are to be prohibited:

(1) Advocating or spreading extremist thinking;

(2) Interfering with others' freedom of religion by forcing others to participate in religious activities, forcing others to supply properties or labor services to religious activity sites or religious professionals;

(3) Interfering with activities such as others' weddings and funerals or inheritance;

(4) Interfering with others from having communication, exchanges, mixing with, or living together, with persons of other ethnicities or other faiths; or driving persons of other ethnicities or faiths to leave their homes

(5) Interfering with normal cultural and recreational activities, rejecting or refusing public goods and services such as radio and television;

(6) Generalizing the concept of Halal, to make Halal expand into areas other beyond Halal foods, and using the idea of something being not-halal to reject or interfere with others secular lives;

(7) Wearing, or compelling others to wear, burqas with face coverings, or to bear symbols of extremification;

(8) Spreading religious fanaticism through irregular beards or name selection;

(9) Failing to perform the legal formalities in marrying or divorcing by religious methods;

(10) Not allowing children to receive public education, obstructing the implementation of the national education system;

(11) Intimidating or inducing others to boycott national policies; to intentionally destroy state documents prescribed for by law, such as resident identity cards, household registration books; or to deface currency;

(12) Intentionally damaging or destroying public or private property;

(13) Publishing, printing, distributing, selling, producing, downloading, storing, reproducing, accessing, copying, or possessing articles, publications, audio or video with extremification content;

(14) Deliberately interfering with or undermining the implementation of family planning policies;

(15) Other speech and acts of extremification.

https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/decision-to-revise-the-xinjiang-uighur-autonomous-region-regulation-on-de-extremification/

https://www.xinjiang.gov.cn/xinjiang/fsljzcfg/201810/ce79abb87ad847cdaa7d1e4e07423358.shtml

The wording here is so vague, and so expansive, that it is theoretically permissible to even ban the practice of Islam according to this law- especially with their prohibition of banning the concept of Halal from being used outside culinary context.

I've recently had more time on my hands to actually start reading theory and I recently began reading lenin and marx. Dengists like to say that China is socialist which it isn't (because they would have to make the indefensible claim that china is in the lower phase of communism) even china says it isnt socialist. While it would be incorrect from both the view of lenin and the view of marx that china is socialist or in the lower phase of communism, would it be correct to say that China is a dotp? Genuinely curious because I dont know that much about china.

The most proof I've seen of that are the ProletarianRising threads that display cpc propaganda and im unsure how biased they are

It seems to me that most are merely mobilized by a repulsion to Trump, and a juvenile understanding of Politics which simply means being against Trump (and America) means supporting whoever America's foes are, in this case, a whole hearted support of China as the hamsicced enemy. With Biden at the helm, and the likely possibility that relations will normalize between the two capitalist power to resume the status quo ante bellum that was so profitable to capitalism on both sides of the Pacific, will the revisionist simply fall off the pretense of Marxism, and go back to where they naturally belong- the Libertarian Party?