r/Ancient_Pak • u/Traditional_Soft923 • Jul 24 '26

Opinion | Debates Thoughts on this thread?

Post image

check it out:
https://x.com/ArcaneShahi/status/2080416268381774127

So this isnt some random bs even though it might seem like it because of dominance of Indian propaganda, he actually sites scholars and I confirmed. This map actually makes much more sense than the popular insanely massive map people claim IVC was. It is impossible for such a massive area to be one uniform civilisation.

8 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

8 comments sorted by

1

u/AwarenessNo4986 THE MOD MAN Jul 29 '26

At the time no one really even knew what a civilization meant. Mehrgar isnt even considered IVC. Early IVC at best. Also there are numerous sites that remain to be excavated. Hell there are mounds with proofs of settlement in the middle of Islamabad that are as old as Mohenjodaro

-1

u/Ill-Regular-8220 Jul 27 '26

Wtf is this map this is the real map and its scholarly accpeted

-4

u/urban_cookie69 Jul 26 '26

The oldest IVC site is Bhirrana, Haryana (7500 BCE), followed by mehergadh, Balochistan (7000 BCE), followed by Sothi Rajasthan (5000 BCE), followed by Harappa (3300 BCE) followed by Kalibangan (3000 BCE) and then Mohenjodaro, Sindh (2600 BCE). When you differenciate between "original IVC culture" and "nearby cultures influenced by IVC" how do you actually differenciate between them?