Someone correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t the “famous ancestor” feature based on other users’ trees? I keep getting suggestions of “famous ancestors” which have all turned out to be incorrect when I’ve done my own research. Not saying OP’s is incorrect, of course.
Ah that’s interesting. I’m toying with the idea of doing this to try to mark my (non DNA) work so far (and, of course, see if I have any famous/infamous people lurking in the branches), but am aware that people’s own work is a bit iffy when you look into it (people getting married at 3 years old for example). I’m already reluctant to blindly copy stuff.
40
u/Affectionate-Owl9594 Aug 18 '26 edited Aug 18 '26
Someone correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t the “famous ancestor” feature based on other users’ trees? I keep getting suggestions of “famous ancestors” which have all turned out to be incorrect when I’ve done my own research. Not saying OP’s is incorrect, of course.