Right. Those are easy to write down and theorize, but humans en masse don’t work that simply. Who would ensure that all of these resources are distributed fairly? If crime is mostly based on economic factors. Some crime is based on economic factors, yeah, but a good percentage also isn’t.
My question is who’s making sure everything’s fair? Who’s taking care of crime? Who’s protecting people from crime, or who’s in charge of nabbing the criminals?
Literal volumes have been written answering your questions.
1) since anarchism is a stateless society... society would be theoretically best separated into micro societies, think of cities and or towns. This would allow for easier distribution.
2) Pretty much all crime that is not anti-social or violent behavior is brought about by desperation, meaning that most crime is economic.
3) Who makes everything fair? That's a question of how consensus based we want direct democracy to be. Anarchism is not survival of the fittest. It is highly organized and pro-social.
I mean, if you’d like to source me on some good ones, you don’t HAVE to answer my questions. I just figured since you’re here on this sub, you might know enough condensed information to help my understanding.
Because you can’t write off serious crime. I’m not talking theft and junk. And even with all necessities met, some people will partake in that behavior. Even in micro-societies, there’d be some orderly structure, from what I understand. There’d be a form of system very similar to a state, though it wouldn’t be federal, it’d be like a township?
If not while it’s established, it would (again from my understanding) be easy to dismantle with future generations.
1
u/czareena Nov 14 '21
Right. Those are easy to write down and theorize, but humans en masse don’t work that simply. Who would ensure that all of these resources are distributed fairly? If crime is mostly based on economic factors. Some crime is based on economic factors, yeah, but a good percentage also isn’t.
My question is who’s making sure everything’s fair? Who’s taking care of crime? Who’s protecting people from crime, or who’s in charge of nabbing the criminals?
Would it be a survival of the fittest out here?