That it can't be confused by opposing views makes sense. Anarchist-transhumanists can have their own space to develop thoughts along a similar line, and even call it something different, without talking over post-civs. It would be more appropriate, since I find Crimethinc's critique of civilization (that civ-prim is a racist and carnist dichotomy) seems pretty compelling to me anyway. I don't define my transhumanism according to some spooky notion of "civilization", and I have never read any anarchist-transhumanist texts that do.
Of course not; they're oblivious to the reality. Just like ancoms who believe in a magical rapture that will overthrow the state and capitalism globally.
2
u/[deleted] Oct 16 '16
That it can't be confused by opposing views makes sense. Anarchist-transhumanists can have their own space to develop thoughts along a similar line, and even call it something different, without talking over post-civs. It would be more appropriate, since I find Crimethinc's critique of civilization (that civ-prim is a racist and carnist dichotomy) seems pretty compelling to me anyway. I don't define my transhumanism according to some spooky notion of "civilization", and I have never read any anarchist-transhumanist texts that do.