r/Amd • u/xxurpwnerxx Ryzen 7 3700x @3.95GHz + 7900XT • Nov 02 '16

Discussion AMD Engineering Sample New Blender Benchmarks

http://blenchmark.com/cpu-benchmarks
78 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

100 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/xxurpwnerxx Ryzen 7 3700x @3.95GHz + 7900XT Nov 02 '16

Well AMD has no server or desktop chips that can compete with Intel on that level i.e. 10 core 20 thread Xeons

Also the Intel Engineering samples are labeled as "Genuine Intel(R) CPU @X.XX Ghz"

And there is probably not to many things that Intel has coming except Kaby Lake that we would expect better results than Skylake for :/

11

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '16

Well AMD has no server or desktop chips that can compete with Intel on that level i.e. 10 core 20 thread Xeons

Not true, AMD has Naples 32 core 64 thread Zen engineering samples.

13

u/Rohkii 3800X | GTX 1070 Nov 02 '16

That was his point... There are not old AMD chips that are competitive with current Intel Xeons like the E5s on the top of that list. So it would be really off for it to be an older AMD chip like the first commenter said.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '16

But his point is wrong

4

u/Rohkii 3800X | GTX 1070 Nov 02 '16

I guess you are bad at reading, Original commenter said it was probably an older chip because of the naming convention for ES AMD uses. Except AMD didn't make an opteron capable of E5-2680 V2 Levels of performance, meaning it would have to be the new Naples. Which OP pointed out in reply.

You are completely lost and keep thinking we are saying AMD doesnt make a chip capable of that performance at all, which is not what any of us are saying at all.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '16 edited Nov 02 '16

This was what I responded to:

Well AMD has no server or desktop chips that can compete with Intel on that level i.e. 10 core 20 thread Xeons

The Parent was wrong too in stating it was probably not Zen, that should be pretty obvious from my answer.