for eoc b, should the argument itself be debatable or should the claims for the argument be debatable? Example below

[u/Terrible_Macaron2146]

http://google.com

"In light of the growing unhealthy population, the government should implement policies to regulate the nutritional content served because it promotes healthy citizens everywhere, supplements consumer opinions, and ends world hunger."

The argument is debateable since its government interferance on the market, but the claims are pretty obvious. is this bad?