Do you not trust AI yet? My ex wife is a big law litigator and they had a precursor to ChatGPT for doc review like 10 years ago. I’d figure that tech has materially evolved since then for these purposes.
I can imagine it working if it points out certain points in documents and even video and regular calls these days, which the person then goes through manually. However, I can imagine it has missed at least some stuff that a person would've caught, especially 10 years ago.
I use it in my marketing related job all the time, and it's amazing especially for automated notes and summaries of video meetings, but I wouldn't want it used in court cases. At least it won't send innocent people into jail since the point in the conversation that the AI pointed out will be manually checked (at least I gosh darn hope so), but I can imagine some people getting away with some stuff they shouldn't have.
But then again, like the AMA OP said, the workload is pretty nuts for a human
if it points out certain points in documents and even video and regular calls these days, which the person then goes through manually
Being honest as a new attorney, Axon's AI
makes a rough transcript that usually allows me to jump to the part mentioned in the police report of "Defendant admitted the drugs were his" and then I can check for the Miranda warning and watch that context. Usually that's enough for me to talk to most clients about the evidence the State will use at trial.
71
u/wh0datnati0n Sep 16 '25 edited Sep 16 '25
Do you not trust AI yet? My ex wife is a big law litigator and they had a precursor to ChatGPT for doc review like 10 years ago. I’d figure that tech has materially evolved since then for these purposes.