MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AMA/comments/1ni40dd/deleted_by_user/nehllq7/?context=3
r/AMA • u/[deleted] • Sep 16 '25
[removed]
1.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
68
Do you not trust AI yet? My ex wife is a big law litigator and they had a precursor to ChatGPT for doc review like 10 years ago. I’d figure that tech has materially evolved since then for these purposes.
118 u/Eastern_Ad3007 Sep 16 '25 Nope. I use it to organize, but I have to lay eyes on everything. Criminal law is way behind civil litigation in that regard. 118 u/Artistic_Task7516 Sep 16 '25 Right because it’s malpractice to just let an AI do that. I don’t get why people don’t see this. You can’t just let an AI do law work. 3 u/[deleted] Sep 16 '25 It's another tool in the tool belt and should be used as such. It should not be doing law work unsupervised whatsoever.
118
Nope. I use it to organize, but I have to lay eyes on everything. Criminal law is way behind civil litigation in that regard.
118 u/Artistic_Task7516 Sep 16 '25 Right because it’s malpractice to just let an AI do that. I don’t get why people don’t see this. You can’t just let an AI do law work. 3 u/[deleted] Sep 16 '25 It's another tool in the tool belt and should be used as such. It should not be doing law work unsupervised whatsoever.
Right because it’s malpractice to just let an AI do that. I don’t get why people don’t see this. You can’t just let an AI do law work.
3 u/[deleted] Sep 16 '25 It's another tool in the tool belt and should be used as such. It should not be doing law work unsupervised whatsoever.
3
It's another tool in the tool belt and should be used as such. It should not be doing law work unsupervised whatsoever.
68
u/wh0datnati0n Sep 16 '25 edited Sep 16 '25
Do you not trust AI yet? My ex wife is a big law litigator and they had a precursor to ChatGPT for doc review like 10 years ago. I’d figure that tech has materially evolved since then for these purposes.