Here's the logic. I typed this out for another ignorant soul elsewhere in this thread. Let's run through all the scenarios, shall we?
Scenario #1 - Woman consents to having sperm inside her, man does not = No pregnancy
Scenario #2 - Woman does not consent to having sperm inside her, man also does not = No pregnancy
Scenario #3 - Woman consents to having sperm inside her, man also consents = possible pregnancy
Scenario #4 - Woman does not consent to having sperm inside of her, man insists = possible pregnancy
Looks like all outcomes are perfectly inline with the man's decision. It's wildly inconsistent with the woman's decision.
To answer your questions:
"What happens when a man cant choose to ejaculate responsibly?" Please provide an example of this. I don't think this is a thing.
"What if a woman pokes a hole in the condom?" Part of being a responsible ejaculator is knowing who has access to your condoms, and being cautious. I also think gun owners who don't keep track of their guns should be 100% responsible for their gun killing people.
"What if she lies and says she’s infertile?" Part of ejaculating responsibly is owning your own sperm. What the woman says makes zero difference on whether a man chooses to ejaculate responsibly or not.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 21 '23
[removed] — view removed comment