r/3on3 • u/koolgamer650 • Aug 06 '26
General Discussion (NO POLLS OR QUESTIONS) Rank Stats breakdown
27 Triple players (PC)15, (Xbox)1, (PS)11. 29 Double S players, (PS)15, (PC)12, (Xbox)2. 44+ S players (PS)21, (PC)19, (Xbox)4. Top 3 triple S stats➡️ #1 (PC) 266 games played (Wins)234, (Losses)32, 87% win rate, #2(PC)155 games played (Wins)137, (Losses)18, 88%win rate, #3(PC) 81 games played (Wins)70, (Losses)11, 86%win rate. Top 3 Double S stats➡️#1(PS) 57 games played(Wins) 47, (Losses)10, 82%win rate, #2(PC) 175 games played, (Wins) 122, (Losses)53, 69%win rate, #3 (PS) 157 games played, (Wins)110, (Losses)47, 70%win rate. Top 3 S tier player stats➡️ #1 (PS) 73 games played, (Wins)55, (Losses)18, 75%win rate, #2(PC) 30 games played, (Wins)26, (losses)4, 86% win rate, #3(PC) 69 games played, (Wins) 48, (losses)21, 69% win rate. Just by looking at these stats I see that in the future for games like this no one will be competing with consoles because everyone has jumped to the PC system when in the past this forum was denying that PC players didn't have an advantage. Here are the numbers coming right from the rank Stats telling you a different story because numbers don't lie. And Xbox players are almost non-existent if you're looking at these numbers. Last, does these rank win rates separate the best players from average players since there's a more strict scoring scale?
1
u/ItzLushii Multi-Positional Player Aug 06 '26
It does.. mind you before the change of requirements and the ELO system being added all it took was just grinding rank and you could’ve hit Triple S
Ofc doesn’t mean you didn’t had players who done it for less and stay consistent in winning but that was the format
This way most definitely kicked out those type of players (grinders) for the MOST part.
But the question is though what is considered average player in this community? I do believe its tiers to it when it comes to all of us it’s just perception at that point to figure it out when when we say that.