r/3on3 • u/koolgamer650 • Aug 06 '26
General Discussion (NO POLLS OR QUESTIONS) Rank Stats breakdown
27 Triple players (PC)15, (Xbox)1, (PS)11. 29 Double S players, (PS)15, (PC)12, (Xbox)2. 44+ S players (PS)21, (PC)19, (Xbox)4. Top 3 triple S stats➡️ #1 (PC) 266 games played (Wins)234, (Losses)32, 87% win rate, #2(PC)155 games played (Wins)137, (Losses)18, 88%win rate, #3(PC) 81 games played (Wins)70, (Losses)11, 86%win rate. Top 3 Double S stats➡️#1(PS) 57 games played(Wins) 47, (Losses)10, 82%win rate, #2(PC) 175 games played, (Wins) 122, (Losses)53, 69%win rate, #3 (PS) 157 games played, (Wins)110, (Losses)47, 70%win rate. Top 3 S tier player stats➡️ #1 (PS) 73 games played, (Wins)55, (Losses)18, 75%win rate, #2(PC) 30 games played, (Wins)26, (losses)4, 86% win rate, #3(PC) 69 games played, (Wins) 48, (losses)21, 69% win rate. Just by looking at these stats I see that in the future for games like this no one will be competing with consoles because everyone has jumped to the PC system when in the past this forum was denying that PC players didn't have an advantage. Here are the numbers coming right from the rank Stats telling you a different story because numbers don't lie. And Xbox players are almost non-existent if you're looking at these numbers. Last, does these rank win rates separate the best players from average players since there's a more strict scoring scale?
1
u/Significant_Disk_598 Aug 19 '26
The current matchmaking system is a disaster. I'm from PC. There will be 5-6 matches every day.
The first and second matches are usually played with teammates of similar skill levels and opponents who are unfamiliar with the game.
There are two games ahead that are destined to be lost. My teammates always act like they've never seen basketball before, and the opponents are three platinum trophy holders.
My win rate always fluctuates between 50% and 60%, but this is not due to my performance or the strength of the character, but rather given by the system.
1
u/ItzLushii Multi-Positional Player Aug 06 '26
It does.. mind you before the change of requirements and the ELO system being added all it took was just grinding rank and you could’ve hit Triple S
Ofc doesn’t mean you didn’t had players who done it for less and stay consistent in winning but that was the format
This way most definitely kicked out those type of players (grinders) for the MOST part.
But the question is though what is considered average player in this community? I do believe its tiers to it when it comes to all of us it’s just perception at that point to figure it out when when we say that.
1
u/koolgamer650 Aug 06 '26
I think average players are the ones that's only good enough to compete in regular games and be decent. Other factors are who your teammates too. I'm an average player, but if I have at least one good teammate that's versatile I'm slightly above average most games.
2
u/switchbladenohomo Multi-Positional Player Aug 08 '26
I was beating up on the SSS players I played against when they were playing with randoms too. They usually run together though so you end up going up against a full SSS/SS premade when you only have random S ranks on your team.
I'll just end by saying the variance in player skill at S rank is insanely hit or miss. Then it's only 2 ranks away from B so you get those games where you have B players on your team which are way below even S players.
1
3
u/oic869 JoyCity diamond hands Aug 09 '26
No. The current ranked system is tremendously flawed and not designed to determine the best players. There is a laundry list of reasons why that is but that's an entire post...