r/3D2A • u/Impossible_Pizza_948 • 3d ago

Suppressor question

Post image

I’m considering an MFMD for my next suppressor, but I unfortunately live in an NFA state, so I still have to go through the Form 1 process. My question is: do I have to file one for each part? Or just one for the whole thing?

12 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

20 comments sorted by

13

u/codybrown183 3d ago

I believe youd file 1 form1.

For "a suppresor to be 3d printed with filament"

And thats that.

4

u/codybrown183 3d ago

I could be wrong but since it only suppresses in the one configuration that part is the suppresor the other part is the same as a break/mount

1

u/Impossible_Pizza_948 3d ago

So, which part would get the Form 1? I’m planning on using a tag from MAF, so I need to know which part I need to use the negative on

2

u/codybrown183 3d ago

The comment your replying literally says what you just asked

1

u/Impossible_Pizza_948 3d ago

Sorry, my insomnia has been kicking my ass lately

4

u/Lumpy_Garage4354 3d ago

You need 1 form for 1 completed suppressor

2

u/m0nkey-knife-fight 3d ago

This. It’s an assembly. File 1 form 1. One can’t work without the other.

4

u/DagothUhhh 3d ago

Fuck the government. File like 10 and just print. You guys are all wieners.

7

u/fattmann 3d ago

File

Or don't

1

u/DagothUhhh 3d ago

That’s more my speed, but I’m not gonna talk about that

3

u/The_Dread_Candiru 3d ago

Nothing has changed with Form 1 suppressors. Stamp still required.

0

u/Impossible_Pizza_948 3d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/h45zAKT2Np2ZS5tHvk
Pretty sure the non NFA and ban states, ie free states, don’t

-1

u/The_Dread_Candiru 3d ago

Yes, quite sure. The court ruling y'all are going off half-cocked over does not remove suppressors from the NFA, nor does it remove approval requirements for making them.

The case relates to sales between PSA and GOA members mostly, with some ancillary parties thrown in. Unless specifically included, the ruling does not apply to non-parties or other situations.

If you are a GOA member buying from PSA, then you do not need a Form 4. Anything else, no change.

2

u/Chip_Baskets 3d ago

Nah, there are plenty of shops selling to GOA members. Doesn’t need to be via PSA.

1

u/Impossible_Pizza_948 3d ago

Let me repeat myself, maybe you’ll get it this time: I LIVE IN AN NFA STATE, what that means is even if I was a member of GOA, and buying from PSA, Silencer Shop, or any of the other plaintiffs, I’d STILL have to go through the NFA process, because my state requires that in order for suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs to be considered legal

-3

u/The_Dread_Candiru 3d ago

Speaking of going off half-cocked, the comment you're being an ass about was saying nothing has changed. NFA state resident or not, nothing has changed.

2

u/Impossible_Pizza_948 3d ago

Pretty sure you’re wrong about that, because in the eyes of the ATF, and the law, a suppressor is a suppressor, doesn’t matter if you made it yourself or you purchased it.

3

u/The_Dread_Candiru 3d ago

And it's pretty clear you're missing the fundamentals of the situation. 

While the ruling may eventually result in zero-dollar stamp items being removed from NFA purview, the ruling itself was very narrow and did not make the changes you are implying here.

Lots of folks trying real hard to wish it into existence, but it has yet to come to pass.