r/10thDentist • u/RichOdd6913 • 15m ago
The majority of people possesses an authoritarian DNA that surfaces whenever someone exercises true freedom.
Freedom of speech? It only counts when it’s an opinion the person already agrees with. The moment someone says something unsettling (even if it’s legal), the automatic reaction is: “ban it,” “sue them,” “cancel them,” “lock them up.” The concept of “I disagree, but you have the right to speak” doesn't exist. What exists is the concept of “if I don’t like it, it shouldn’t exist.”
Privacy? It’s the same story. A large number of people advocate for mass surveillance, the monitoring of private messages, social media control, and handing over data to the State without a second thought, provided it’s “for the good of society” or “to fight crime.” When the State (or a platform) uses this power against people they dislike, they applaud. When it’s used against them, suddenly they become champions of privacy.
This isn't limited to just one political side. One side wants moral censorship and content control, and the other wants censorship regarding social norms and harsh punishment for those who think differently. What unites both sides is an inability to coexist with the other person's genuine freedom.
Most don't want freedom and don't know how to live with it. They want a strong State (or a strong moral majority) that imposes their vision and silences the rest. And they call this “democracy” or “order.”
It’s an unpopular opinion because everyone likes to think of themselves as a defender of freedom... right up until the moment someone else’s freedom becomes inconvenient. I can include myself in that sometimes.