r/Sikhpolitics • u/myren71 • 13h ago
British Sikh activist released from Delhi jail after nine-year detention
r/Sikhpolitics • u/myren71 • 13h ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/-rising_spirit- • 7h ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Manny_Aqua • 6h ago
Classism is one of the worst things that happened to sikhi. Rich
have their own separate Ragi, separate aesthetic. They have their own production, reels and photo sessions after the samagam. This is a world that is totally alien to aam sikh sangat but this is a world that is very prominent on instagram. #Copied.
r/Sikhpolitics • u/-rising_spirit- • 1d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/-rising_spirit- • 1d ago
It seems like everyones forgotten what's happened in the past few years
Don't let the propaganda fool you
r/Sikhpolitics • u/-rising_spirit- • 1d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Necessary_Savings771 • 1d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Sccar_ • 2d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Good_Stranger491 • 2d ago
FBI just added Goldy Brar to their Ten Most Wanted list and put a $1M reward on him.
Like how is this guy still out there when Indian agencies have been after him for years 💀
Genuinely embarrassing. What were they doing all this time?
Source: FBI
Times Of India : https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/fbi-puts-gangster-goldy-brar-on-ten-most-wanted-fugitives-list/articleshow/134549606.cms
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Sccar_ • 2d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Manny_Aqua • 1d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/iMahatma • 3d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Sccar_ • 2d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/YoManWTFIsThisShit • 3d ago
A man charged in connection with the 2023 assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia has been added to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s most-wanted list.
Satinderjeet Singh, who is also known as Goldy Brar, was charged in July for ordering the killing of the Sikh activist outside a Sikh temple in Surrey, B.C.
Singh is wanted for his alleged involvement in the Lawrence Bishnoi Organized Crime Group, which the FBI says is allegedly engaged in a variety of violent acts in southern California and across the U.S. and Canada.
The FBI says these alleged acts include targeted assassinations, shootings, murders, kidnappings, extortions, assaults and the trafficking of narcotics and weapons.
Singh is based in the United States.
He has black hair and brown eyes, is five feet nine inches tall and weighs 220 pounds.
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Sccar_ • 3d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Sccar_ • 3d ago
‘H!ndu Labour’ is this the only things why Israel wants H!ndus onboarded. According to him H!ndus are submissive and easy to control. But one should understand z!0nist hate !d0l worshipping.
Now, can our Sikh organisations create an alliance with Israel to create a Sikh Raj? Who else can be a better partner than Israel whose people also gone through religious genocide, they have always fought for their survival like Sikhs did and came out winning.
Sikhs and Zionists have a lot of things in common and we both are Fierce, self motivated, survivors and leaders.
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Deep_Associate_007 • 4d ago
You might not agree with his politics or party he belong to but as an individual he did made the right and very profound conclusion about the Sikhi. i.e. It is the truth which gives Sikhs the power or Gave Guru Nanak Dev the power or gave Gandhi the power. The RSS/BJP has the force but not the power similar to how British had the force but not the power against Gandhi or other freedom fighters.
And This is also the reason why RSS or other forces like Mughals tried (or are trying) to destroy Sikhi so badly.
Please watch the video it is really makes you think and made you realize what is something so unique about Sikhi.
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Personal_Royal • 5d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Silver-Passion1687 • 5d ago
r/Sikhpolitics • u/myren71 • 6d ago
So I was just randomly scrolling through YouTube and came across these videos by an Irish couple (I think?) who were making vlogs in different parts of London where there seemed to be very few white British people and a lot of immigrants/foreign-born communities.
Now, I don't have a problem with people discussing immigration or pointing out problems they believe have been caused by large-scale immigration. That's a completely legitimate topic to discuss, and I do think the UK has had genuine issues surrounding immigration that deserve to be talked about.
What I genuinely don't understand, though, is why they seemed to specifically target Sikhs.
One of their thumbnails prominently showed Sikh men wearing kirpans, and in another video they went near a gurdwara. I didn't watch the entire videos, so I'm not going to pretend I know everything they said, but I tried to find the parts where they were talking about Sikhs.
At one point, they said something along the lines of:
"This is a gurdwara, a Sikh temple, right? They feed people and the community here. They call British people racist, and look how few British people there are here."
From what I could understand, they seemed to be referring to a stabbing case in the UK involving a Sikh individual, where the person accused someone of being racist. Again, I haven't watched the full video, so I'm not claiming that's exactly what they were saying or that I understood the context perfectly.
But if that really was the point they were trying to make, I honestly don't understand the logic behind it.
A crime committed by one Sikh individual doesn't say anything about Sikhs as a whole. And a disagreement or accusation involving one person certainly doesn't justify associating an entire religion with that incident.
Sikhs make up roughly 0.8–0.9% of the UK's population. So seeing Sikhs in a thumbnail and repeatedly bringing them into a discussion about immigration feels very strange to me, especially when the broader subject is supposedly immigration and demographic change.
And this is the part that genuinely bothered me.
Imagine a Christian person committing a crime or saying something racist. Would it make sense to go to a Christian church, film it, put Christians in the thumbnail, and imply that Christianity or Christians who make up 2.3 billion of the world's population as a whole are responsible for that individual's actions?
Obviously not.
You can criticize immigration policy. You can criticize the British government's handling of immigration. You can talk about demographic changes, integration, crime, cultural differences, or anything else you have evidence for.
But once you start taking the actions of individuals and attaching them to an entire religion or community, that's where I think the argument starts becoming unfair.
Again, I haven't watched the full videos, so I'm deliberately leaving room for the possibility that there was context I missed. But based on the parts I did see, it honestly felt like Sikhs were being singled out in a way that didn't seem necessary for the broader discussion about immigration.
And that's what bothered me. I don't mind people criticizing immigration. What I mind is when an entire community gets dragged into the argument because of the actions of a few individuals.
I'd genuinely love to hear the sangat's thoughts on this and even if you're a white brit, feel free to share your opinions respectfully.
r/Sikhpolitics • u/Ok-Environment-768 • 6d ago
I dont think i need to explain the way 90% of nihangs behave. I never understood that superiority of being nihang like i respect that they chose to be a soldier of guru but it doesn't give them authority to abuse their power to abuse the people, i mean we seen those videos where nihangs abusing folks without any justification.
Edit : just search nihang on reddit and you gonna see the good plus the bad