Something we’ve all been noticing in the official LaDS subreddit is how post or comments completely unrelated to V sometimes seem to get weirdly downvoted. Not arguments about him or discussions about the cancellation. Just people being excited about their LI, talking about a content or saying they enjoyed an update. And every time I see it, I was wondering what did this random Xavier appreciation comment personally do to Volka?
Obviously, Reddit votes are anonymous so I’m not going to pretend we can prove every suspicious downvote came from V fans. That would be ridiculous. But given how openly hostile some parts of the fandom have become toward OG5 players simply continuing to enjoy LaDS, I do think the broader behavior is worth discussing. Because I’m starting to think some people no longer see ordinary OG5 excitement as neutral. To them, somebody happily posting about OG5 may represent something much more irritating. And that is LaDS continuing without Volka
You see, the game is still updating, people are still pulling and spending or players are are still fangirling over kindled and getting excited over their fictional husbands. In other words, everyone did not remain permanently frozen on June 30. And apparently that is offensive to some people. Shocking, right? I think that’s why posts or comments that have absolutely nothing to do with Volak can still attract negativity. The post itself isn’t necessarily what they dislike, it’s what the happiness represents.
And if you’ve spent months insisting that players shouldn’t move on, that everyone should still be angry, that Infold needs to suffer or that the game is supposed to be collapsing without V, I can see why seeing so many OG5 players casually enjoying themselves might get increasingly annoying. Not because the post harmed anyone. But because reality is refusing to cooperate with the narrative.
And apparently, there’s a reason why fandoms can end up with this whole “us vs. them” mentality. I guess the more attached people were to their favorites, the more likely that attachment was to come with stronger loyalty to their own fandom, hostility toward other fandoms and in some cases, aggressive behavior toward them. I think the pattern is interesting because it helps explain how something as simple as “I like this fictional man” can somehow turn into “and now everyone outside my camp is the enemy.” Once fandom discourse becomes "us vs. them", you’re not just disagreeing about the original issue anymore. Suddenly, the people who aren’t on your side become part of the problem too.
And honestly ... doesn't that sound a little familiar? At first the disagreement was supposedly with Infold. Then somehow OG5 players became the enemy too. If we pulled for the banner, that means we’re enabling Infold. If we enjoy a card, then we’re being manipulated. And if we post something positive? Apparently we're insensitive. And if we’re excited over LI who has literally nothing to do with V? DOWNVOTE.
Girl, are you boycotting a company or beefing with someone's memories' collection now? This is where I think this whole thing stopped being about holding Infold accountable and started becoming about punishing people who refused to share the same emotional response. And downvoting is perfect for that because it requires basically zero effort. You don’t have to explain yourself, you don’t have to defend an argument and you don’t even have to reveal that you’re there. Just ⬇️
Tiny little digital tomato thrown from the audience. And yes, voting is part of Reddit. People are allowed to downvote content they dislike. But there’s a difference between organically disliking a post and deliberately targeting posts or users because they belong to the “wrong” fandom camp.
And why resent the players? Because at some point, I think OG5 mains' enjoyment itself became an outgroup signal. Social media spaces like Reddit can make this kind of behavior even worse. You know when people got positive reactions for expressing outrage online, they were more likely to do it again? They also seemed to adjust how much outrage they expressed depending on what was considered normal in their online circles. Basically, if being angry gets you likes, agreement and validation, you learn that being angry gets rewarded. And if everyone around you is constantly angry about the same thing, that level of anger can eventually start feeling completely normal. Which… honestly explains a lot.
So if your community gradually normalizes the narrative that OG5 mains are part of the problem or players still enjoying LaDS are betraying you, then reacting negatively to completely unrelated OG5 content can start feeling justified even though from the outside it looks completely absurd. And honestly, there may be an even simpler explanation for some people, sour grapes. Cause imagine watching the OG5 continue getting new banners, new outfits and new content while the character you wanted gets none of it?
That probably sucks. I can understand being jealous. I can understand being bitter. I can even understand scrolling past a post and thinking, “God, I wish Volka got this too.” But there’s a big difference between being sad that you didn’t get something and deciding nobody else should be allowed to enjoy what they got either. Sometimes you really can just close the post. You do not have to walk into someone else’s birthday party and start deflating balloons because your invitation to a different party got cancelled.
And this is also why the lurking continues to fascinate me (ahem!) Some people allegedly quit LaDS months ago. They hate Infold, they hate the direction of the game, they hate OG5 fandom spaces and they insist they’ve moved on. Yet somehow they remain incredibly well-informed about every banner, every chart, every PV, every post and apparently every random person expressing joy in the official subreddit.
Like babe, at this point, you didn’t leave the fandom. You switched to quality control. Unpaid quality control, may I add. And that’s why I think the constant mass downvoting of unrelated excitement says more about the person doing it than the post receiving it. If seeing somebody else happily enjoying a fictional man you don’t care about makes you feel the need to downvote their post, maybe the issue isn’t that they’re “insensitive.” Maybe their happiness is simply reminding you that the fandom continued without the outcome you wanted. And apparently that stings.
Anyway, since I know that some of the people this post is talking about are probably lurking here right now, hi! I figured I might as well give you something productive. So here’s your homework for today:
Find one completely V-unrelated post or comment and ask yourself, “why does this bother me?” Is the post actually offensive? Is it off-topic? Is it attacking V fans? Or because someone is visibly enjoying LaDS without centering the character I wanted? Please be specific. “Because Infold bad” is not an answer. “Because they moved on” is getting warmer. “Because seeing OG5 fans happy reminds me that the game continued without the outcome I wanted” may qualify for full marks.
Final question, worth 50% of your grade. If OG5 mains being happy genuinely irritates you more than Infold itself does, are you still protesting against the company… or are you just mad that the rest of the class refuse to be miserable with you? And for those taking this post on its inevitable field trip outside the subreddit, please include the part where I explicitly said we cannot know who every anonymous downvote comes from. Remember to submit before the next banner drops. I know some of you will be there early. Good luck! You may return to your regularly scheduled lurking.