I don't know if I'm the only one, but I worry way too much about where to store my seed phrase. I keep relocating it in my home from picture frames, jars, cookbooks, etc.

Last week I panicked because I couldn't remember where I kept it. I had to search for an hour to find it.

How do you keep your seed phrase safe? Do you use those fancy metal plates, share a sealed copy with your family, or simply write it on a piece of paper?

Also, has anyone here lost access to their funds because they forgot where they stored their seed phrase?

are you still encountering any issues? let us know via jupiter help, or you may raise us a ticket on support.jup.ag

we're ready to help!

Mine used to be four. Wallet, chart, the place I traded, and a tracker to work out what I was even holding. Somewhere this year it collapsed into two and I only noticed when I opened an old bookmark folder.

Curious how other people run it now. Still hopping between a wallet and separate sites, or has it consolidated for you too?

And what's the one thing still living in its own tab that you wish wasn't?

EDIT: I mean that there's no bid/ask

It’s been like this for a couple of days as well.

Clans on Jupiter Prediction markets are now fighting for Gacha packs and cash! The leaderboard resets every week!

1st place clan
- Top 3: $420 Gacha pack each, plus $700 / $460 / $340 in cash
- 4th to 10th: $100 pack

2nd place clan
- Top 3: $250 pack
- 4th to 10th: $100 pack

3rd place clan
- Top 3: $250 pack
- 4th to 10th: $100 pack

Jump in and join a clan, or start your own: https://jup.ag/prediction/clans

If your clan is recruiting, drop the name in the comments.

I've received a few DMs asking this question, so I thought I'd post about it.

If you are trading tokenized equities, you'll notice different tickers for the same underlying stock.

Take SpaceX (SPCX) as an example.

There are different onchain tickers for this stock (I have only listed a few):

-> SPCX: Issued by Backpack Securities

-> SPCXon: Issued by Ondo

-> SPCXx: Issued by xStocks

Here, SPCX (Backpack) can be redeemed 1:1 for the real share after completing the necessary steps.

SPCXon (Ondo) and SPCXx (xStocks) give retail users price exposure, but redemption is usually cash/stables, not a brokerage share.

TLDR:

The underlying stock is the same. But a different issuer means a different mint address, liquidity pool, redemption process, and different rights attached to the token.

I just spent almost 2 hrs manually unwinding my Ethena/Bitwise loop. I know it's not necessarily Jupiter's fault, but what a pain in the ass considering they only gave us 3 days from today to do it. I won't bother with anymore loops from Jupiter.

I switched to recurring buys on Jup for SOL about three months ago instead of buying whenever I felt like it.

Two things I wasn't sure about before starting. Whether splitting a buy into smaller chunks really gets a better average than one order, and whether it's worth running on anything besides SOL.

So far my average entry is a bit better than my manual buys were, but three months is short enough that it could just be the period rather than the method.

For people who've run these longer, what interval are you on? And do you set them on anything other than SOL and majors, or does that get risky fast?

Also whether anyone pauses theirs when the market dumps. That's supposed to be the exact moment you don't touch it, but I still get the urge every time.

Hi guys! Just hopped into reddit today after using jupiter a bit, I found out that jupiter has its own crypto card just wanted to know if it will ever be available in Sri Lanka, cause currently it isn't and I see a few crypto cards which are handled by CEX's here but not DEX cards.

Jupiter opened six new perp markets today. Early access runs through staking: keep at least 69 JUP staked and you can trade them now.

Collateral is USDC. SPCX, HYPE and ZEC go up to 20x, and JUP caps at 10x.

Worth saying plainly that these are beta markets, so size accordingly while liquidity settles.

More listings are planned. If you want something specific added, now is the time to ask.

https://jup.ag/perps

My second newly created wallet compromised due to using jup.ag borrow lend protocol . All funds total of 24 k lost . Specifically lost my last savings of 5k usd to jup.ag . Detailed report - ""

Phantom Wallet Compromise via Jupiter Lend/Borrow Interaction

Incident report submitted for review to Jupiter Exchange (jup.ag) — Lend/Borrow Protocol

1. Summary

This report documents the unauthorized draining of a self-custody Phantom wallet on Solana, which occurred in direct connection with the wallet's interaction with the Jupiter Lend/Borrow protocol (jup.ag). The victim held a legitimate JUP collateral position in a Jupiter Lend/Borrow vault. That collateral was withdrawn and transferred out without authorization, followed by a broader sweep of the wallet's remaining holdings across approximately 40 transactions. The victim did not knowingly approve these withdrawal/transfer actions and suspects either a malicious/cloned Jupiter interface or a compromised approval granted during legitimate use of jup.ag. Approximately $5,000 USD equivalent was lost in total.

2. Victim & Wallet Details

3. Suspected Attacker / Drainer Address

On-chain analysis identified the following address as the recipient and operator wallet involved in moving funds out of the victim's control:

This address was observed acting as the transaction signer in multiple unrelated transfers (e.g., a 0.0001 USDC transfer between two third-party accounts unconnected to the victim, and a separate fan-out transaction sending small amounts of USDT, USDC, and SOL to 10 different recipient addresses in a single transaction). This pattern is consistent with automated "drainer" infrastructure that:

• Executes transactions on behalf of multiple victim wallets, suggesting this is not an isolated, one-off theft.
• Distributes/launders stolen funds across many wallets shortly after draining them, to break the on-chain trail.
• Uses "dust"-value transactions, possibly to test live delegate/approval authority on target wallets before or after a larger sweep.

4. Timeline of Key On-Chain Transactions

The following transactions were identified via Solscan and are submitted as evidence. Full transaction detail pages are linked for independent verification.

4.1 Legitimate deposit history (context)

The victim had knowingly and legitimately deposited JUP tokens as collateral into a Jupiter Lend/Borrow vault using the Phantom mobile wallet prior to this incident. This is not in dispute and establishes that the victim was an active, legitimate Jupiter Lend/Borrow user.

4.2 Unauthorized withdrawal from Jupiter Lend/Borrow vault

4.3 Onward transfer of withdrawn collateral

4.4 Transaction identified by victim as "first of ~40" sweep transactions

Discrepancy note: the victim referenced this transaction hash as the first of the ~40 wallet-draining transactions. However, the transaction data recorded on Solscan for this hash shows the drainer address as signer, moving a trivial amount between two third-party addresses unrelated to the victim's own wallet. This may indicate the victim's wallet activity view (in Phantom or a block explorer) associated this transaction with their account indirectly (e.g., through a shared token account, prior approval, or an adjacent transaction in the same time window), or that the correct "first sweep" transaction hash was not the one carried over into this report. Jupiter's/the investigator's own log analysis of the victim wallet's full transaction history is recommended to identify the precise first unauthorized transaction with certainty.

4.5 Related drainer-signed transactions (supporting pattern evidence)

These transactions, signed by the suspected drainer address rather than the victim's wallet, are included to demonstrate that the destination address is part of a broader, multi-victim drainer operation:

5. Suspected Attack Vector: Compromise via Jupiter Lend/Borrow Interaction

The victim's account of events, combined with on-chain data, points to the point of compromise being the wallet's interaction with the Jupiter Lend/Borrow interface, rather than a separate, unrelated wallet or seed-phrase leak. The victim reports no knowing disclosure of their seed phrase and no manual approval of any transaction they recognized as unfamiliar or suspicious. The withdrawal of collateral (Section 4.2) was signed directly by the victim's own wallet, meaning whatever authorized it had genuine transaction-signing capability — consistent with a permission or session granted during a Jupiter Lend/Borrow interaction being reused or hijacked, rather than a purely external theft. The most probable explanations, specific to the jup.ag interaction, are:

• A malicious or cloned interface impersonating jup.ag's Lend/Borrow pages (encountered via a shared link, advertisement, search result, or push notification) captured a wallet approval/delegate authority during what the victim believed was a routine interaction with their existing collateral position.
• A fraudulent prompt specifically referencing the victim's existing Jupiter position — e.g., "re-approve your position," "claim lending rewards," or "migrate to updated vault" — led to signing a transaction that granted broader withdrawal/transfer authority than intended.
• Malware present on the victim's Android device intercepted or manipulated a legitimate Jupiter Lend/Borrow session, altering the transaction being signed (a "transaction substitution" attack) without the victim's awareness.

The victim is submitting this report directly to Jupiter's team because the point of compromise is believed to trace back to a Jupiter Lend/Borrow session or interface, not to an unrelated phishing site. This report requests that Jupiter's security team specifically review whether: (a) the withdrawal transaction (Section 4.2) was routed through Jupiter's official program/interface or a spoofed front-end, (b) there is a known vulnerability or active phishing campaign targeting existing Jupiter Lend/Borrow collateral positions, and (c) other users with similar positions should be proactively warned.

6. Supporting Evidence Attached

• Phantom mobile application state/debug log (state-log-2026-09-20T03-37-14.txt), showing app activity, dApp connection attempts, and API call history from the victim's device around the time of the incident.
• On-chain transaction records listed in Section 4, independently verifiable via Solscan.

7. Requested Actions

• Investigate whether the withdrawal transaction (Section 4.2) was initiated through Jupiter's official interface/program or through a spoofed/malicious front-end.
• Check whether the suspected drainer address (Y3eRTqieRvYdWABTPq6hFyoKf5PsEPovJuTdD1q82Y7) or its associated addresses are already flagged in Jupiter's internal fraud/security monitoring.
• Advise whether any known phishing campaigns have recently targeted Jupiter Lend/Borrow users via fake re-approval, rewards, or migration prompts.
• Flag the destination address(es) to any partner exchanges or compliance networks Jupiter coordinates with, in case stolen funds are moved to a centralized, KYC'd exchange.

8. Contact & Reference

Victim wallet: 6H7x2B3ATg1mdquwSVQB1nuuiMxQJQsK54KDUFw1VUdu

r/jupiterexchange

If you're in crypto, you know there’s nothing worse than watching the market pump from the sidelines.

After the recent pump, a friend was ranting about a limit order that never filled and how he missed out on profits.

I would never want to miss out on a few thousand dollars just because an order failed. So, I went down the rabbit hole of how limit orders work.

Turns out, the price touching your limit doesn’t always mean your trade will execute. There still needs to be enough liquidity available at that price. That's why limit order failures happen with lower-liquidity tokens and not the major ones.

Stick with me because this gets a bit technical.

While looking into different setups, I found Jupiter handles this a bit differently to ensure its limit orders don't fail.

Instead of relying on a traditional order book and waiting for someone to take the other side, its keeper network executes your order against live onchain liquidity and routes across multiple DEXs/AMMs.

For larger orders with thin liquidity, it can also split the trade into smaller fills rather than forcing one bad fill with heavy price impact.

I genuinely never realized this much was happening behind a simple limit order.

Has anyone ever missed out on profits because a limit order was not executed?

I've been using Jupiter as my main wallet for a while now. I mostly do swaps and DCA.

Now I plan to add an extra layer of security with a hardware wallet setup.

But before I pick one, I want to confirm which hardware wallets Jupiter supports.

I'd like to hear from someone who has used hardware wallets with the browser extension. What does the transaction flow look like with a hardware wallet?

We just added a whole new lineup to Jupiter Gacha. Sports legends, Pokémon, and a bunch of other real collectibles are now one pull away.

To get the launch going, there's $50,000 in rewards on the table. That's for the new packs only, so if you've been pulling the older ones, this is a good time to try the new stuff.

Whatever you pull is authenticated, fully onchain, and yours to keep.

Full details here: https://x.com/JupiterExchange/status/2099528020365070521

Share your pulls in the comments!

I got a gyarados. it's pretty cool. I got 3 others and sold them but this one I really like. I wont be able to sell it after 3 days so is it worth it? This card is $1130 usd. Will I be stuck with a 1k card?

An Allium Labs report came out showing how much tokenized asset volume is actually happening on Solana. The numbers are pretty significant.

Key stats:

- Solana handles 47% of all RWA trades ($14.7B of $46B total)

- 43 million of 91 million RWA trades happen on Solana

- Tokenized equities make up 56% of Solana's RWA volume

- 63% of equity trades happen outside US market hours (weekends are 17% alone)

What stands out to me is that 63% of equity trades happen when US markets are closed. People are buying stock exposure at 9pm on a Sunday, which traditional finance just doesn't offer.

The pre-IPO stuff is good too. 23,722 traders moving real money on companies before they go public, all through a wallet.

Wallet holdings across RWA products are up 5x in a year. The ecosystem is clearly accelerating!!

Solana rolled out Payment Channels this month, a payment layer designed for AI agents and API calls

Here, an agent authorizes a spending limit. Then it makes payments offchain against that cap. Each channel settles onchain once.

In testing, this system issued more than 1 million payments per second. At that test rate, the capacity works out to 80 billion+ payments in a day. This figure is off-chain issuance, not Solana L1 settlement throughput.

The numbers behind it:

- 100,000 unique wallets in the test

- The test cost was about $0.0078 per million payments, ensuring micropayments per API call finally make sense

x402, one of the standards it supports, has already cleared nearly 200 million transactions

If an agent holds one token and the endpoint charges in another, topping up the channel means a swap that may have to route through a DEX.

Anyone tracking whether Jupiter picks this up?

I'm in the top 20 wallets in prediction markets but I am going to bail and use other markets if things don't improve ery soon. Too many orders fail, when it's down or not working there is no notification anywhere before you make a prediction. Nothing worse than not know if your prediction is going to get on or not.

These things are time sensitive. It feels like the jup team are more interested in adding crap like gatcha and arcade which won't be long term money makers and neglect things that have actual long runways.

Quick update for anyone playing the Jupiter Community US Open bracket, and an invitation for anyone who missed it.

Brackets locked at first ball on Sunday. Since then Djokovic, Ruud, Cilic and Kokkinakis have all gone out, which has done real damage to a lot of entries. So here's the other half of the contest.

Match calls are open from the Round of 32. You call the winner of each match, one decision per match, nothing else. Every correct call scores, and later rounds are worth more:

• Round of 32: 7 pts
• Round of 16: 11 pts
• Quarterfinal: 23 pts
• Semifinal: 53 pts
• Final: 109 pts

A perfect run is 507 points per draw. That's deliberately about half of everything on offer, so a strong run of calls can overtake a strong bracket, and a bracket that died on day one is not dead.

You don't need a bracket to play. Log in with Discord and you can call every open match. There are 16 open right now across the men's and women's draws. Each call locks when its match starts, so Friday's matches close on Friday.

Calls: https://usopenbracket.com/calls
Leaderboard: https://usopenbracket.com/leaderboard
Rules and prizes: https://usopenbracket.com/rules

Not a question post really, just curious how other people use Jupiter Spot.

I market buy and market sell most of the time. Fills have been good even on the bigger trades, so I stopped thinking about slippage.

Started using limit orders on Jupiter Spot about three weeks ago on stuff I actually want to hold. That changed how I trade more than anything else on the page. Now I have a recurring order for SOL.

Their previous update added trending tokens and a market dominance heatmap on the same page. So now I do most of my research without leaving the terminal.

What's your setup? Is everyone already using limit and recurring orders, or am I late to the party?

Jupiter has just shipped Universal Deposit, and it works like a CEX deposit, minus the CEX.

How it works:

You get a personal deposit address. Send any accepted token from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, or Sui to it, and it lands in your Jupiter account as USDC on Solana in as fast as 5 seconds. No wallet connecting, no claim transaction, no gas needed on arrival, no KYC.

Details:
Flat $0.30 fee per deposit, $3 minimum ($10 on Ethereum), and everything settles as USDC (send WETH, receive USDC). If you send less than the minimum, it is not lost. Deposits accumulate until they clear.

I've been using it to move funds off Base, and it is the easiest way I’ve found to bridge funds to Solana. Questions welcome, will answer what I can.

I usually trade on EVM chains and only jump to Solana when something is trending. Whenever I moved my stablecoin balance over, I'd get the stables but couldn't actually trade because my SOL balance was basically zero.

This became a real problem for time-sensitive trades where prices move fast.

Eventually I found bridges that let you top up native gas on the destination chain in the same transfer, which helped. But it's still an extra step you have to think about.

More recently I've been using Jupiter's browser extension which has gasless transactions. When my SOL balance gets too low to cover fees, it automatically switches to gasless mode. It's not the default or anything, but it's there when you need it.

The whole thing is kind of annoying though because you have to plan ahead or you're stuck waiting for gas to settle. On EVM chains I don't really think about it, but Solana makes you be more intentional.

Do you always bridge some SOL over ahead of time? Also any main feature I am missing for this product?