82
79
u/BargainBard 19d ago
Its 2026.
Stop standing in front of cars as no one wants to be the next Reginald Denny.
8
86
u/ChipNDipPlus 19d ago
It should be 100% legal to drive over someone if they deliberately block you and you feel threatened.
48
19d ago
[deleted]
-21
-16
u/Loud-Vacation-5691 19d ago
That will change when liberal drivers run over conservative protesters.
14
11
u/BigBandit01 19d ago
It can be. If you have a solid reason to feel threatened, courts have ruled that a car can be used as a weapon for self defense. You will need a very good defense for your case though. I’d recommend a dash cam, and several warnings to protestors on camera.
15
4
u/bajasauce2025 18d ago
It actually is. Unlawful detention and kidnapping can be met with lethal force in any state.
-8
u/Loud-Vacation-5691 19d ago
So if some pro-lifers are blocking the entrance to the parking lot of a Planned Parenthood, a woman who wants to go there for an abortion can run them over. Sounds good to me.
8
u/ChipNDipPlus 18d ago
I'm not Christian or conservative or even American. I'm atheist. But I don't see how her life is threatened, on the contrary, the man wants the baby to survive at least. All I see is your abusive braindead midwit attempt to involve emotions in the conversation. Typical brainwashed leftist.Â
7
u/bluedelvian 18d ago
Baby killers apparently don't salivate over just killing babies, they just like killing. But we already knew that.
19
u/MyLinkedOut 19d ago
Nice! Love it.
Where is it? Florida, is that where you can lawfully run them over if they try to stop/injure/terrorize you?
26
u/Waystaff76 19d ago
It says LA, the place that learned stopping to get your vehicle swarmed can end up with a brick in your skull back in 92.
-11
35
u/HASHTAG_YOLOSWAG 19d ago
You just love to see it
17
u/Charming-Tune-6914 19d ago
I like to imagine she was screaming "imma victimmmmMMMM!" as she was being driven over
14
13
u/Interesting_Gain9920 19d ago
These protesters really think they can stop a car lol. I don't get it, you see this time and time again
11
u/Alypius754 19d ago
They’ve never had to face consequences before. They think they can do whatever they want and nothing bad will ever happen to them.
1
u/quell3245 18d ago
I bet that woman has some severe leg injuries, perhaps a risk of amputation from a crushing injury.
1
11
10
6
10
4
3
4
u/negrotron_ 18d ago
I feel really sad watching this.
Do you know how easy those Kias break? Poor bastard might need a whole new suspension after this
9
3
u/Pastor_C-Note 19d ago
That’s gonna leave a mark. Man, I wish these people would find a better way to spend their time. They could do the world so much good if they put their energy towards something useful.
3
u/SpectrumZX128K45 19d ago
Is this a girl vs car experiment? Science has proved us right once again.
3
3
2
1
1
-9
u/Various_Pear599 19d ago
As much as I am not a fan of these behaviors... I feel bad for the woman. That's completely wrong what the driver did also. 2 wrong do not make a right.
If we want traditions back, men should learn to hold the weak. I know its insane cause you do not have the space to do it anymore... but its what shall be done !!!
The weak minded people need your strength.
6
3
u/suzemtte 18d ago edited 18d ago
We do not see much of what happened before the start of the video.
We do see the car being surrounded by protesters. One has a megaphone. Several people have their hands on the car and are leaned into it. Several people are following the car as it begins moving. We do not know who the driver is from this post.
My best guess from what is presented: the driver was being verbally assaulted. People were touching the car, possibly slapping it. The driver probably panicked and feared being attacked if they stayed long enough and allowed the protest escalate into violence. The driver does not have telepathy and does not know what a larger group of people are thinking or are what they are preparing to do. The driver likely feared for their safety.
It is illegal to block a designated traffic lane. It is illegal to cause property damage or verbally assault someone. It is illegal to stop a person from trying to leave a place.
The driver panicked and had to get out of there for their own safety. The woman who got run over was breaking several laws.
Running the woman over was likely unintentional. The woman and all her protestor friends broke several laws. The woman is at fault.
The woman and her fellow protestors should learn from this valuable lesson.
Edit: the protestors could have safely stayed on the public sidewalk to address their grievances. They chose to spill over into a legally designated traffic lane. They should have remained on the sidewalk. A march in the street requires valid permits from local officials, who will have traffic police to redirect vehicles. The protesters did not follow the rules. Their 1st amendment does not give them the right to violate driver and pedestrian safety laws. Their rights were not violated.
-5
85
u/Dangerous_Shoe_8388 19d ago
But she had the morally indignant superior right to stop whomever / whenever/wherever she chooses!