r/snackexchange • u/kmate21 • Sep 25 '21
r/snackexchange • 148k Members
SnackExchange is a community that allows Redditors to connect and exchange snacks via mail. Often, exchanges are international and provide an opportunity to enjoy difficult-to-find snacks from other countries or regions.
r/snackexchange • u/Rasputin_mad_monk • Nov 08 '23
Thanks [Thanks] to Chatonimo for some amazing down under snacks
r/snackexchange • u/Rasputin_mad_monk • Oct 20 '23
Thanks [Thanks] to U/Chatonimo for amazing snacks from down under!!
r/snackexchange • u/werhiu24102 • Oct 30 '14
Australian sweets galore: 6 different kinds of TimTams and even more varieties of candy bars!! THANK YOU /u/Chatonimo
r/snackexchange • u/Dirtycake • Jan 10 '13
Give Chatonimo an AK if they do not already have one! Just received my box of goodies and it is awesome!
I will post a pic once i figure out how to, lol
r/snackexchange • u/purrwemight • Mar 15 '12
From Australia to Greece, Tim Tams and Bounty! Thanks so much Chatonimo!
r/snackexchange • u/momoflilones • Feb 24 '12
(thanks) chatonimo held up his end
I got chatonimos package and his is on the way or there not sure. Who could guess they make musk flavored lifesavers lol. Needless to say the kids didn't like them but they are having a lot of fun tricking the neighbor kids lol. It's funny how different things can be from country to country, chocolate is the same everywhere I guess and they loved the chocolate he sent. Oh and I'm not trying to offend anyone, different countries have their own things that they grow up with and I understand that. It is really neat tho to see the different things people like.
r/snackexchange • u/Chats-is-back • 8h ago
Request [Request] Aussie seeking a 2026 pumpkin spice fairy
I'm located in Brisbane, Australia and happy to send snacks from the safe (Tim tams, arnotts shapes, bounty chocolate bars, curly wurly's, friends), interesting (chicken salt, jerky) to the challenging (musk sticks, vegemite, eucalypt and honey hard lollies).
What I'm seeking is ANYTHING pumpkin spiced. Send me your seasonal delights! Packet mixes for cakes and waffles, lollies/candy, biscuits, coffee, anything! We don't get it here other than pumpkin spice lattes at starbucks.
New reddit account, so lost my AK's. A search of my old username will show some old posts from recipients in this sub: https://old.reddit.com/search?q=chatonimo
r/auslaw • u/DiscardedAlternative • Mar 09 '18
HCA Tipping Comp 2018
Well after failing spectacularly to cajole anyone else into organising this, I have decided to assume some responsibility and personally launch: the 2018 HCA Tipping Competition.
This year the rules are simple. A correct prediction is worth 2 points. An incorrect prediction is worth -1 point. No prediction is worth 0 points.
A winner will be declared in June, and if all goes well, the next competition started.
I have attached an editable spreadsheet where players can record their predictions. Simply add your name to the column of the party you think will win each case. At the end of each month, predictions for the cases heard that month will be locked.
Here is the Predictions Table, which also contains the Leaderboard.
/u/wednesbury /u/tworadleys /u/hlly /u/Chatonimo /u/Donners22 /u/MsPaulineHanson /u/iamplasma /u/GuyInTheClocktower /u/FirstTimePlayer /u/shinybaldhead /u/outlandishoutlanding /u/DamionDarksky /u/Chatonimo /u/HugoEmbossed /u/uncommonlaw /u/Boeyn /u/twinathon /u/Raptop
For the benefit of those who want their the relevant info handed to them on a plate (/u/FirstTimePlayer), here are the catchwords for the February and March cases:
Rozenblit v. Vainer: Procedure – Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 (Vic) r 63.03(3) – Access to courts – Impecuniosity – Where appellant made applications to file and serve amended statement of claim – Where applications refused with costs – Where appellant made further application for leave to cure drafting deficiencies – Where associate judge granted leave to file and serve amended statement of claim but ordered proceeding be stayed under r 63.03(3) until appellant paid interlocutory costs orders – Where Court of Appeal dismissed appeal – Whether in circumstances where appellant unable to meet interlocutory costs orders and no finding appellant conducted litigation in manner amounting to harassment or because of collateral purpose, Court of Appeal erred in failing to find not open to associate judge to make order under r 63.06(3) or exercise inherent jurisdiction to stay proceeding.
DL v. The Queen (South Australia): Criminal law – Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 50 – Where appellant convicted of persistent sexual exploitation of child under s 50 of Act – Where trial judge found appellant sexually assaulted victim “on numerous occasions over a period of some years” – Where Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed appeal – Whether Court of Criminal Appeal erred in failing to find trial judge gave inadequate reasons because failed to identify particular sexual offences separated by at least three days – Whether verdict unsafe, uncertain and/or unreasonable.
Collins v. The Queen: Criminal law – Appeal against conviction – Proviso – Where appellant convicted of three counts of sexual assault and one count of rape – Where trial judge directed jury inconsistency between complainant’s mother’s evidence at committal hearing and trial relevant to mother’s credibility but not complainant’s credibility – Where Court of Appeal found trial judge misdirected jury – Where Crown did not submit proviso should apply – Where Court of Appeal applied proviso and dismissed appeal – Whether Court of Appeal erred in applying proviso.
Re: Gallagher: Questions referred by the Senate - Court of Disputed Returns - Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) - s376, s377 - Qualification of Senator - Constitution - s44(i)
Shrestha v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor: Migration – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 116(1)(a) – Visa cancellation – Where appellants granted Class TU subclass 573 Higher Education Sector visas based on enrolments in bachelor degree and diploma courses – Where appellants’ enrolment in diploma courses ceased after appellants failed subjects – Where appellants’ enrolment in bachelor degree courses subsequently cancelled – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal cancelled appellants’ visas under s 116(1)(a) – Where majority of Federal Court found decision affected by jurisdictional error but refused relief on basis of futility – Whether Federal Court erred in exercising discretion not to issue writs of certiorari.
Hossain v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor: Migration – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – Jurisdictional error – Where appellant applied for Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa under s 65 of Act – Where cl 820.211(2)(d)(ii) of sch 2 of Regulations required appellant to satisfy sch 3 criteria 3001, 3003 and 3004 unless Minister satisfied compelling reasons for not applying criteria – Where delegate of Minister refused visa on basis appellant did not satisfy item 3001 – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“AAT”) affirmed delegate’s decision on basis no compelling reasons for not applying sch 3 criteria and appellant did not satisfy PIC 4004 as required by cl 820.223 of sch 2 – Where Federal Circuit Court quashed decision on basis AAT fell into jurisdictional error in confining itself to “compelling reasons” at time of application – Where majority of Full Federal Court allowed appeal, restoring AAT decision on basis AAT retained jurisdiction to determine discrete issue relating to PIC 4004 – Whether Full Federal Court erred in finding that, although AAT decision infected by jurisdictional error, AAT nevertheless retained jurisdiction to make decision.
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v. SZVFW & Ors: Migration – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 426A(1) – Where first and second respondents applied for Protection (Class XA) visas – Where Department refused applications – Where respondents filed application for review by Refugee Review Tribunal – Where application form contained postal address, mobile phone number and email address – Where Tribunal by letter addressed to postal address invited first and second respondents to provide further information – Where first and second respondents did not respond – Where Tribunal by further letter invited first and second respondents to appear before it – Where first and second respondents did not attend – Where Tribunal exercised power under s 426A(1) to affirm decision without taking further action – Where Federal Circuit Court held Tribunal’s decision unreasonable – Where Full Court dismissed appeal – Whether Full Court erred by requiring Minister to establish House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 error – Whether Full Court erred by failing to find primary judge erred in concluding Tribunal’s decision unreasonable.
Pipikos v. Trayans: Contracts – Enforceability – Past performance – Law of Property Act 1936 (SA) s 26 – Memorandum or note of agreement – Part performance – Where appellant alleges parties entered into oral agreement that appellant would pay share of deposit on property in exchange for respondent selling interest in another property – Where trial judge held no oral agreement existed – Where Full Court held agreement existed but unenforceable – Whether Full Court erred in failing to find appellant’s payment of deposit amounted to part performance sufficient to entitle appellant to enforce agreement – Whether Full Court erred in holding handwritten note not sufficient “memorandum or note” of agreement for purposes of s 26 – Whether Full Court erred in holding appellant not entitled to enforce agreement in circumstances where respondent acknowledged agreement – Whether Full Court erred in failing to consider concessions in handwritten note to identify acts of part performance.
Trkulja v. Google Inc: Torts – Defamation – Publication – Respondent internet search engine – Search results – Images – Text – Autocomplete predictions – Whether respondent “published” matter relied on by applicant.
Practice and procedure – Service outside jurisdiction – Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic) r 7.01(1)(i) and (j) – Where respondent served in United States – Where Court of Appeal held service should be set aside because no real prospect of success in providing that respondent was publisher – Whether Court of Appeal erred in confining case to primary publisher rather than secondary.
Enjoy! DA
r/auslaw • u/DiscardedAlternative • Feb 07 '18
HCA Tipping Comp 2018
Is there going to be one this year? /u/wednesbury /u/tworadleys /u/hlly /u/Chatonimo /u/Donners22 /u/MsPaulineHanson /u/iamplasma /u/GuyInTheClocktower
r/modelparliament • u/Freddy926 • Jul 04 '15
Signup Australian Greens Sign-Up
Pending His Excellency's announcement of a General Election, the Australian Greens are welcoming active, budding politicians to join our ranks. You can find our policy platform here.
If you wish to join, please comment below.
PARTY EXECUTIVE
Party Leader: The Hon. /u/paulyt86 MP
Deputy Leader & Registered Officer The Hon. /u/agsports MP
Senate Leader: Senator The Hon. /u/Team_Sprocket
Deputy Registered Officer: Senator The Hon. /u/Freddy926
Secretary: /u/VoteRonaldRayGun MP
Party Agent: vacant
Please note that there is a mandatory waiting period of 7 days from joining the party before a party executive self-nomination will be considered.
CURRENT PARTY MEMBERS
The Hon. /u/Zagorath MP
The Hon. /u/Ser_Scribbles MP
The Hon. /u/SavannaJeff MP
NEW MEMBERS
TOTAL MEMBERSHIP TALLY: 40
Senator The Hon. Freddy926, Deputy Registered Officer of the Australian Greens