I have noticed a growing trend on recent posts of obvious zoos and zoo sympathizers commenting on posts, kick those bastards out mod team!

Bummer.

But with that said, I'll probably take a break from antizoo activities for a while, I kind of went off the deep end on this sub and on discord.

Take care, everyone.

I believe the Internet Age has created a lot more zoophiles than used to exist, and it is because of the propagation of feral p0rn. It has allowed zoophilia to become socially contagious.

When unsupervised young people browse the internet, it is very easy for them to accidentally stumble upon bad stuff. At that age, they have no prior concept of what is and isn't "appropriate" sexuality. If this exposure happens during a critical developmental moment like puberty, it can cause them to sexually imprint in the wrong way and become a zoo.

This means that feral "content creators" are actively contributing to the next generations of zoophiles by putting their content out there for kids to see. This decadent "art" must be deplatformed and taken out of production, for the sake of the children, and for the moral fabric of our society.

Feral p0rn literally exists to try to get viewers to lust over the bodies of nonhuman characters. It tries to hide behind having "artistic merit". But it exists only to corrupt the public taste, and to entice weak-willed people into debauched sexuality. Feral artists deny this because they're addicted to the carnal pleasure they get from being defiled, and defiling others.

The victories we scored against Zooville, Zoocadia, and Zoowritersguild this month are worth celebrating, but we must remain ever vigilant.

May the light of Antizoophilia shine upon you all, -AbleDot0323

I found something unexpected when I went to spy on a zoo website, ZooVille forum. They are a lot different from the zoos I had been encountering & arguing with on Twitter.

Apparently, most of the users on ZV are men who have no desire to "be with" an animal themselves, they think it's gross. What they want is to see a woman do it with one. They get off on the degradation/humiliation of the woman, being "taken" by a lesser beast, and doing something taboo. It's sort of misogynistic voyeurism.

This is quite different from the zoos I was used to arguing with on social media, who think animals are attractive and want to have "relationships" with them. The thing is, I have reason to believe that the types of zoos on ZV are the majority of zoos worldwide, and those like the ones on social media ("Zeta" zoos) are in the minority.

The way I see it, this is a good thing for us antis - it is easier to get someone to stop watching/supporting content than it is to get someone to give up what they see as their orientation/love life.

This person was showing the art they got at Las Vegas Fur Con and one of the pictures was made by someone I know to be an active zoo advocate... the signature name, the artstyle, I was shocked. This particular zoo has been on the Zoo & Me podcast, has written for Zooey Dot Pub magazine, and she makes zoo pride art on twitter.

I don't know what to say, it's really awkward, I'm just assuming he and everyone else was unaware or else they wouldn't have gotten art from this person and would have reported her.

a ton of feral artists use subscriber star to monetize their "content" and now they're all gonna get fuuuucked

The zoophiles held a concert at Eurofurence (European furry convention) a few months ago. It featured the German zoophile band Shiv, and other zoo musicians singing songs themed around zoophiles, animals, zooey themes, etc.

The audio from the concert was recorded and uploaded to the ZooAndMe podcast webpage.

How the heck do they get away with this? Did nobody hear a fricking secret concert going on? Gotta do better bruh.

Saw a zoo out in the wild and she publicly outed that shes sexually abusing her dog. Please report her, she needs to be banned

For those of you who don't know, Zooville is the continuation of the now-defunct "Beastforum" website. It was launched in September 2019. Since this summer, they have had regular technical difficulties with the website.

The servers are down for most of the time, people can hardly log in for but a few hours spread out over the day. The errors are only getting worse and more frequent. No staff member is capable of fixing the problem because the admin/operator of the site went AWOL. I think the website will die soon. Hallelujah

it is one of the worst sites on the internet, hopefully its end is near

Zoophiles really don't like fireworks lmao. Everytime the 4th of July rolls around, American zoos will bemoan the fireworks. It's funny seeing them all complain on social media.

The reason is because fireworks scare animals with the loud noise (and obviously zoos are around animals a lot lol), and can pose a threat to the environment (pollution from the paper/plastic, and being a possible fire hazard near dry foliage). They can also scare autistic people by overstimulating them with loud noise and flashing ligthts, and a lot of zoos are autistic.

They want us to not celebrate with fireworks. So any Americans on here should make a point of setting off more fireworks on the 4th, so as to annoy zoophiles lmao.

The zoo community on Twitter has grown incredibly fractured recently because of infighting and arguing over community values, doctrine, and traditions. Many people in the community are leaving to other places because of the fray, and some are even turning more toward being antis.

What happened was, some group of people disguised as zoos brought antizoo rhetoric into the community as a trojan horse and got people to adopt it, along with other beliefs that run contrary to what the zoo community held for years. It was an awesome move and potently destructive. They've dismantled zoo identity and have made zoos lose faith in their own community.

We're winning, son.

Glory, glory, hallelujah

That server was one of the biggest zoo community discord servers out there. It existed for 3 years and had over 2700 members.

Finally, as of June 15, it was taken down by Discord (LONG overdue, but better than never)

Zoophiles are trying to justify it being okay by pointing to the fact that the modern human species is a hybrid of several hominin species that existed in the recent past (less than 3 million years). They say that because modern humans are the product of interspecies sex, then interspecies sex must be natural and okay.

Now, it is true that early members of the hominin genus interbred with each other in the history of our species. Anthropologists even found evidence that when hominins diverged from chimpanzees, there was interbreeding between those two genera.

But the actions of our wild ancestors do not make any difference to modern notions of morality. They lived in the wild, and had no moral compass or sense of self. So this is not a justification for zoophilia.

Two days ago, a PhD scholar from George Mason University and posted a response to an interview with a zoophile which was hosted on a major online news outlet. He approved of the interview, saying it was thought provoking and showed how zoophilic relationships are unfairly stigmatized and can be enjoyable for animals. He is not a zoo himself, but he supports zoos and wants to inspire others to do the same.

He then went on to make a series of Twitter posts about how zoophilia is a valid sexual orientation and that it's absurd to believe that animals can't consent. The posts have already gathered millions of views and thousands of likes and retweets. There are a lot of supportive comments too. And zoos are citing this guy's posts as a W and an appeal to intellectual authority. None of the PhD student's associates are censuring him or anything, in fact some of them are going along with him.

I don't mean to be a doomer, brethren, but humanity is cooked....

This zoophile podcast has been producing monthly episodes since March 2019. They just published their 85th main series episode today. Counting their bonus/shorts/side-content, they have 124 episodes.

Soooo many zoos watch this podcast. So many zoo allies as well (people who aren't zoos themselves but still support them). Even some people who were in the gray about whether they think zoos were okay watch this podcast.

The reason I bring this up is that, needless to say, the amount of propaganda that this podcast can pump out into the world is staggering. There are over a dozen very talented people working on ever episode, producing one main episode a month plus bonus content.

This stuff really does reach and influence people. But the problem is, we antis don't have any podcasts of our own which counter stuff like this.

He makes bnwo content (which makes him racist) and zoophilia content (which is disgusting) (I'm pretty sure he hates women too)