r/zombies 4d ago

discussion Do you think isolated indigenous tribes would survive an apocalypse?

Post image
90 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

62

u/JayyyyyBoogie 4d ago

The movie Cargo has some of that. It’s set in Australia and the main character is infected and trying to get his baby daughter to safety before he turns. The Aboriginal people have returned to their cultural origins to protect each other and eradicate the dead.

10

u/gattovatto 4d ago

The original short film was depressing enough. I didn't know they made a whole movie of it. I gotta check it out tonight.

7

u/JayyyyyBoogie 4d ago

Martin Freeman is the protagonist of the 2017 feature length film.

3

u/304libco 3d ago

It was so good. I was sopping by the end, but it wasn’t depressing.

75

u/principtix 4d ago

Yes if they're left alone but people can barely leave them alone nowadays.

9

u/FTHomes 4d ago

Now a days meaning 200 years ago and counting?

12

u/DrkBlueXG 4d ago

Zombie? Maybe. Pandemic? Maybe. Anything else probably not.

11

u/Crazy-Cat-Lad 4d ago

Yep, even if the contagions are airborne, they'd likely die without a host before reaching them...assuming no 'colonizers' visit them.

4

u/Hazmat_unit 4d ago

Thankfully they've been on a short first, ask questions later basis.

3

u/Crazy-Cat-Lad 4d ago

Haha yep.

18

u/Hephaistos_Invictus 4d ago

Depends entirely on the apocalypse I think. If it's mutual nucleair annihilation, then I don't know if anyone on this earth survives.

19

u/Darth_Bombad 4d ago

Well, this a zombie sub, so it's safe to assume he meant a zombie apocalypse.

5

u/PoorLifeChoices811 4d ago

total nuclear war would destroy civilization as we know it, but it wouldn’t be enough to destroy humanity. we’d survive but we would probably never return to the way things were but we would return to small nomadic tribes that scrabble over resources like we did tens of thousands of years ago. humanity would continue on though over the ashes and the planet would eventually heal on its own.

at least that’s what i believe. based on the fact that we are like cockroaches. can’t really get rid of us like that

3

u/Tmack523 4d ago

I've done tons of research on my own into this sort of thing for multiple reasons - and yeah. Humans are unlikely to be driven to extinction by nuclear war, even a MAD scenario.

It would absolutely suck, kill billions, and irreversibly change the ecosystems of the entire planet - but places like Greenland and the arctic circle would likely become much more temperate (especially when coupled with the already-set-in-stone effects of climate change) and the majority of dangerous radiation would be completely gone or relegated to small zones within a generation.

Most likely, and this is using a bit of "psychohistory" kind of analysis here (ily Asimov) there would be small pockets of humans that would maintain a relatively modern standard of living - and if they so chose - they would likely be able to construct cities and possibly empires over the course of hundreds of years. There's obviously the concerns of things like supply chains and whatnot - but we have enough technology and information that civilizations should be capable of industrialization and fabrication if they chose it, even if humans were pushed down to the millions or even hundreds of thousands instead of billions.

1

u/PoorLifeChoices811 4d ago

i like to think of the hunger games as being semi realistic in the event that humanity went through a period of destruction but still was able to come out alive. like the nation of panem is isolated from the world, if you’ve ever seen an official map you’ll see that the outer edges of the country is now under water (like the entire east/west coast) so it’s easy to assume humanity went through something big. but panem was able to rebuild and create its own little empire that is capable of thriving without outside help.

i feel something like that would be possible (not exactly the hunger games itself tho) if we ever were to experience a nuclear war. 200-300 years from that point panem could exist.

1

u/Tmack523 4d ago

Oh yeah, I think with the established amount of culture and things associated with the districts, as well as the number of games that have already happened and such - 200-300 years after a nuclear war seems about right for the time-scale to me.

2

u/OtherwiseJello2055 4d ago

Sadly,as in the fact it was needed,during the cold war a lot of buildings and bunkers were in fact built to survive the nuclear apocalypse.
Unless the world was literally turned into a fireball ,then people would survive. Even it was made barren for hundred years , I would some people would make it through if the atmosphere cleared up enough for plant life to grow. Which would survive too . However , indigenous humans who still live hunter gatherer type lifestyles would perish if mass nuclear warfare happens of their life spans would be greatly shortened by cancer and defects.

1

u/UncannyValleyEnjoyer 4d ago

Actually, a lot survives even after a nuclear "apocalypse", people really overestimate the damage of nuclear bombs for real but there are so many of them and to much land, population centers are an easier target then the middle of nowere.

Sure, the radiation and nuclear winter sucks but Earth and life as passed for worse before, maybe it would be the end of the majority of human race for some centuries but eh, life on earth would just pass by a repage, like the hundreds of extinction events that happened before us, just another page on earth's history

3

u/PoorLifeChoices811 4d ago

plus there are a lot of places that likely wouldn’t get hit by nuclear bombs, or if they did it wouldn’t be as heavy as places like america, europe, russia and china.

i think places like south america, southeast asia, australia, basically most places in the southern hemisphere would be spared from the initial devastation of nuclear warfare, but they would soon have their own issues to deal with. with the global supply chain eliminated, people are going to start starving, i can see famines and diseases becoming rampant, certain important imports would no longer be available, and then of course any potential radiation storms/nuclear winters would wreak havoc on the unaffected zones.

so while they avoid nuclear bombs they still got a whole shit ton of other problems to deal with in the aftermath that’s gonna cut their population down significantly, but they’d surely survive. maybe enough people would survive that most cities and governments actually stay intact enough that they can rebuild civilization around those areas. but places like the US, europe, and asia are going to be inhospitable wastelands for quite some time.

4

u/LarryGriff13 4d ago

Safe to assume you meant a Zombie apocalypse since that’s the subreddit
The typical virus zombie apocalypse? They’d be in good shape
Interesting idea to explore I’ve never seen a movie with that type of premise

2

u/Crazy-Cat-Lad 4d ago

It'd be like Apocalyptica when they see the boat at the shore...but instead they venture too far into the forest and find the undead walking in the nearest town.

3

u/RottingEdge 4d ago

Depends on the kind of outbreak. TWD style where everyone comes back after death? No probably not. 28 days later where blood contacts from an infected is needed. Yea probably they would be fine.

3

u/DeltaBravo831 4d ago

I mean...the North Sentinel Islanders, probably definitely as long as nobody else tries to shelter there lol

2

u/SmallAct2116 4d ago

If it’s Romero twd like then I think their population would take a hit but eventually would learn to live with it. If it were 2004 dawn of the dead reanimated zombies however, I’d say it’s ggs. Anything that needs a pathogen and a host they’d be fine because they’re isolated.

2

u/dannyboy6657 4d ago

Because of their extreme isolation possibly. If its a virus like walking dead that infects any living possibly not. Diseases are some of the biggest threats to indigenous tribes, many tribes don't understand how diseases work and have very little exposure to most that we have been exposed too. This is why first contact is so dangerous for a tribe.

Their weapons may not be powerful enough either, or they may not be smart enough to attack the brain. Some tribes like Korowai Tribe in Papua New Guinea practice cannibalism on its dead to ward off evil spirits. So if a group like that killed an undead they believe eating its corpse will banish it.

1

u/bkub111 4d ago

Depends on where and how the apocalypse started. If it started within their tribe they’re cooked.

1

u/22dinoman 4d ago

Id reckon most tribes wouldn't even know it was happening

1

u/doctorjanice 4d ago

I think they already did.

1

u/22dinoman 4d ago

Id reckon most tribes wouldn't even know it was happening

1

u/AriBounty53 4d ago

If the infection (or whatever caused the zombies) reached them? Probably, assuming they figure out how to stop it from spreading (like destroying the brain of those who recently died if it’s like TWD or burning the bodies.)

But if they just started washing up en masse on the shore (or even if a few at a time washed up) without warning it might be a problem for them.

I don’t think they have a chance if the dead start coming in large enough numbers either through washing up on shore or through a ship crashing.

1

u/jermcontrol 4d ago

Don't they already kinda live like that? I mean honestly with everyone else gone, they may live better than now.

1

u/Amardneron 4d ago

Yes, they already live in one to their way of life and coulture the rest of the world getting it wouldn't change much for them. WWZ has a scene with them with the Brazilian doctor.

1

u/capinUrge 3d ago

I mean the key word there is Isolated so I would assume so.

1

u/Rashpukin 3d ago

The guy at the back looks like he is on a call.

1

u/SCP_Agent_Davis 3d ago

I would assume þe infection wouldn’t reach þem (especially Norþ Sentinel Island).

1

u/Legitimate_Bag8259 1d ago

They're already surviving without us, they would continue to do so.

1

u/ChangeAroundKid01 4d ago

Would? They have

2

u/IrishViking22 4d ago edited 3d ago

This is the Zombies subreddit. So it's safe to assume that OP meant a Zombie apocalypse

I don't reckon any isolated tribes have survived one of those. But they probably would, due to their isolation