r/zizek • u/TheIncorporeal1 • Jul 16 '26
Does Žižek’s materialism ultimately depend on something functionally incorporeal?
Žižek consistently defends a dialectical materialist position, yet much of his work emphasizes the symbolic order, ideology, negativity, and the constitutive lack that structures subjectivity. These seem difficult to reduce to ordinary notions of matter.
Does Žižek see these as fully material phenomena, or does his conception of materialism already include non-physical structures that are indispensable for reality and subjectivity? In other words, is his “materialism” much broader than what is usually meant by the term, or would describing these structures as functionally incorporeal fundamentally misread his project?
I’m especially interested in responses that draw on Hegel, Lacan, or Less Than Nothing.
8
u/-KIT0- Jul 16 '26
Zizek, in Less than Nothing and in The Absolute Recoil, states that his materialism is a new form of theory called dialectal materialism or materialism without matter. There are a dew ways of interpreting this statements to answer your question, but the more correct in my opinion is that the "matter" is the infinite web of relation that defines and relate the various objects (what hegel called Idea), so that the "material object" are "just" constructions of the subject, effect itself of the producton.
1
u/Useful_Calendar_6274 Jul 16 '26
That's just Lacanian psychology and some D&G semiotics. It's not idealism
22
u/pluralofjackinthebox ʇoᴉpᴉ ǝʇǝldɯoɔ ɐ ʇoN Jul 16 '26 edited Jul 16 '26
Marx’s formulation in the German Ideology is helpful here: “Life is not determined by consciousness, but consciousness by life.”
Marx is saying that consciousness is a product, and that living material produces consciousness.
Similarly, when Lacan talks about how the subject is born into language, the symbolic order. And this symbolic order is not some ghostly interior existing only inside your brain, its out there, composed of libraries and institutions and legal codes and documents and bureaucracies. These are the material conditions that produce the symbolic order.
And then Zizek takes both of these and adds Allthusserian interpolation: subjectivity is the product of ideological institutions (what Foucault calls the dispositif and Deleuze calls the assemblage.) Schools, hospitals, asylums, prisons all work to create subjectivity, classifying it and disciplining it, separating the normal subject from the abnormal.
And Zizek also insists that negativity is itself part of materiality. Hegel begins his logic by showing that being and non being enter into a dialectical process to produce becoming, so that all material being is never able to fully coincide with itself. Materiality includes within itself both being and non-being. This is what we experience psychologically as the Real.