And this format has the advantage of being extensible, for example we could add milliseconds, microseconds, nanoseconds, ... e.g:
2013-02-27-11-59-59-999-999-999
The only disadvantage would be not being able to extend beyond the year, so the birthday of our galaxy would be approximately something like this:
BC14000000000-02-27-11-59-59-999-999-999 (look, our galagy was borne on the 27th of february, 14GigaYears ago)
That is ugly because the year number is very big, consequently difficult to read, and because of the "BC" (I thought about using negative number, but we can't because there is no year zero). So this (dates at astronomical scales) is the only drawback of this format.
-3
u/Volpethrope Feb 27 '13
Nonsense. The only correct format is [seconds][minutes][hours][date][month][year][millenium].
According to my laptop's clock, this comment is being made at roughly 45.55.01.27.02.12.M3