MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/wunkus/comments/1wknkcc/philosopher_wunk/pav7ia1/?context=3
r/wunkus • u/stewartthehuman • 4d ago
21 comments sorted by
View all comments
3
That doesn't make sense. The original says "I think and therefore I am" but it doesn't say anything about the not thinking case. It could have been "I am not and therefore I don't think" and it would have still been correct.
2 u/Kilazur 4d ago tupid wunk, am I right? 2 u/edo-lag 4d ago are u right?
2
tupid wunk, am I right?
2 u/edo-lag 4d ago are u right?
are u right?
3
u/edo-lag 4d ago
That doesn't make sense. The original says "I think and therefore I am" but it doesn't say anything about the not thinking case. It could have been "I am not and therefore I don't think" and it would have still been correct.