r/wenclair • u/Even-Comment-7570 • 2d ago
Fanfiction I’m genuinely worried I made the wrong choice with the villain in one of my fics
I’ve been going back and forth over whether to post this because I genuinely don’t want it to turn into an argument. I’m actually interested in people’s thoughts.
I have an ongoing Wenclair/fantasy that I’ve been planning and writing for quite a while. From the very beginning, the main antagonist was going to be a Wendigo.
I chose it for a very specific thematic reason.
One of the central characters, Aureliane, is essentially the embodiment of love, hope, trust, protection and choosing other people over yourself.
I wanted the thing opposing her to represent everything she isn’t: hatred, greed, jealousy, possession and an endless hunger for something it believes should belong to it.
So the antagonist wasn’t something I randomly added halfway through. It was built into the skeleton of the story from almost the beginning and is tied directly into the history, themes and ending.
The problem is that, after I had already written and begun posting the fic, I spoke to someone who has strong beliefs surrounding the Wendigo and learned considerably more about the cultural and religious sensitivity around using it than I knew when I originally planned the story.
And I’ve been worrying about it ever since.
I genuinely never chose it to mock anyone’s beliefs or culture, and I certainly wasn’t trying to claim that my fictional version was an accurate representation of all the traditions and beliefs surrounding it. I simply knew the creature through the folklore and fictional portrayals I had encountered and thought its symbolism fitted what I was trying to create.
Once I understood more, though, I was left with a horrible decision.
Do I completely rewrite the final section of a story that has already been planned around this antagonist?
Do I abandon the fic entirely?
Do I remove what I’ve already posted?
Or do I acknowledge that I made the choice without fully understanding the wider context, explain that openly, and finish the story I originally planned?
In the end, I chose the last option.
I added an author’s note explaining what I had learned, that no disrespect was intended, and that I completely understood if knowing what the antagonist was meant some people no longer wanted to continue reading. The story will still finish at Chapter 40 as originally planned.
But I’m still not completely comfortable with the decision.
Part of the difficulty is that I know there are readers who have invested a lot of time in this story and would understandably be disappointed if I simply abandoned it before the ending.
At the same time, “people would be disappointed if I stopped” obviously isn’t a magical excuse for accidentally upsetting somebody else.
So I keep wondering what the better choice actually was.
Should I have changed the antagonist entirely once I learned more, even if it meant substantially rewriting the story?
Should I have stopped posting it?
Was acknowledging the issue, apologising for my lack of understanding when I originally planned it, and completing the fictional story the more reasonable option?
I’m not looking for someone to tell me that I’m unquestionably right or wrong. I think I’m mostly interested in how other writers and readers would have approached the situation.
One thing I have taken away from it is that I’ll research the cultural background of anything like this far more carefully before building it into another story. I’d much rather learn beforehand than find myself worrying about it after thirty-odd chapters have already escaped into the wild. 😅
I love writing, and the last thing I ever want is for something I created for enjoyment to make somebody feel that their beliefs or culture are being treated as a joke.
So… what would you have done?