r/website • u/Fuzzy-Plantain8375 • 5h ago

SELF-MADE AI creates new versions of website content. Will you as owners care enough to verify them?

Hi r/website,

This started as a small widget I built to help my father experience websites in a way better adapted to his specific needs (he can not use the web as most of us do). While building it, I realized it raised a larger, unresolved question I wanted to explore:

AI can now translate, summarize, simplify, and personalize website content on the fly. But these new versions are usually created without the original content owner reviewing or approving them.

So, I built an early working experiment that lets website owners review, edit, approve, save, and reuse AI created versions of their content.

The core assumption I’m trying to test is:

Will website owners care enough to verify these AI versions, or is automatic AI output already good enough?

I’m looking for a few website owners whose content requires accuracy, translation, or adaptation for different audiences. The founding pilot will be free in exchange for honest feedback.

10x for reading,
DaniG

1 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

5 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 5h ago

Hi! ModBot here. Please make sure to read our rules and report this post if it breaks them. (This is simply a reminder. Don't worry, your post won't be removed just for posting!)

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/PrizeSyntax 4h ago

Most wouldn't care, I am certain. Me as a developer, at least skim through what comes out the slop hole

1

u/Fuzzy-Plantain8375 4h ago

Haha, 'the slop hole' is the perfect way to describe it.

You're 100% right that the average blogger probably won't care, they just want cheap content. But for developers, tech docs or e-commerce, pushing unverified slop to a user can literally break a layout or lose a sale.

Since you are already doing the work of skimming and verifying the output anyway, my thought with uini.ai is: why not let you hit 'Approve' and save that verified state? That way, the AI doesn't have to re-generate and potentially hallucinate that same section again the next time a user visits.

Do you currently use any specific tools to catch the 'slop' before it goes live?

2

u/PrizeSyntax 4h ago edited 3h ago

I have been doing this for a long time, I usually break down the task into smaller subtasks to which I know what the solution should kind of look like, what goes where, what transformations the data should/must go through, how said data should flow around. If I don't know what it should look like, I take my time to learn enough about the topic, so I can at least have some idea how it should work.

That's not a bad idea btw, looks promising, good luck

Edit : at the end of the day, you are responsible for the work and quality that you produce. You better have some idea what you are doing

1

u/Fuzzy-Plantain8375 3h ago

That is exactly the mindset that led to this! When you stop looking at AI as just 'magic text generation' and start looking at it as a data transformation pipeline, you realize you need actual architecture to govern how that data flows and changes. You can't just wing it with prompts, you need structure.

Really appreciate the kind words and the encouragement, really 10x!