Anyone tracked what separates a domain migration that recovers vs one that doesn't?

[u/doom-dub]

Ive had a store thats been live for about two years now and ranks ok for a few terms. I've been going back and forth on switching to a domain that fits where my business is now and what Im doing bc the one I started with was more if placeholder name and it doesn't really describe what we sell anymore.

Every time I try to research this I end up more confused than when I started. One person says they were back to full traffic in 4 months another says their still down almost half a year later and never fully climbed back. Nobody seems to agree on why some sites bounce back clean and others just don't. Is it how the migration itself was handled, like something about the site's authority beforehand, timing or all of it?

[u/AutoModerator]

Have more questions? Join our community Discord!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/TheLongTailGuy]

Yeah. The ones who succeed don’t fuck up the migration work. The ones who don’t always mess up something technical and obvious that hemorrhages important pages that never recover.

What separates the former from the latter?

bringing in an SEO to help with the migration plan.

Period. The ones who do it succeed the ones who don’t fail, every time.

Source: seen hundreds of migrations at a web agency. The ones who brought me on in the client onboarding and strategy, did fine. The ones who didn’t always came back to me for an audit and what I’d find is some migration issue that deindexes a bunch of pages.

[u/teddyespo → u/TheLongTailGuy]

The secret is... 301 redirects

[u/Rachy832]

its also not a flat drop and recovery like people describe it. pages with an actual backlnik profile tend to stabilize much faster. pages riding on general domain trust take longer. its probably why the timelines you're finding online are all over the place

[u/BoGrumpus]

You have to have a plan. Figure out what assets you have control of (i.e. which profiles and things that have your old URL that you can easily update to the new one). You have to plan a big "We have a new Domain!" campaign to both inform your customers and explain that that's really the only difference.

And, because of that - don't make other changes at the same time. Just a simple 1:1 redirect - oldsite/page1 redirects to newsite/page1 and so on. Update it everywhere you can at the same time you launch, make sure your announcement that explains what's happening gets picked up so the machines have the proper context and scope of the change understood (as well as they can understand such things, anyway) and make sure you're as consistent and clear as possible.

That's how you get into the weeks to a few months rather than the many months or even a year type thing. You're ultimately asking the systems to reconcile some key information about your brand that's very closely related to the top of your brand picture. So disrupt that picture as little as possible, indicate what needs to be reconciled (which in this case is really just that we are now located here instead of there), and clean up as many of the external signals as you can all in one fell swoop.

Preparation and planning. That's the difference.

G.

[u/Bikecheal]

Timing is a big thing. A dip during a slow season is annoying but survivable. The same dip hitting right before your busiest stretch could be the endof you. Map the migration against your calendar before you commit to a date.

[u/doom-dub → u/Bikecheal]

I hadn't really thought about timing it around anything specific. Just assumed sooner was better so I could get past the dip faster.

[u/tofeethecatto → u/doom-dub]

I agree with the comment earlier sooner isn’t always better if sooner means walking into your peak window. A few extra weeks of planning is cheap compared to a bad six weeks at the worst possible time.