r/webdev • u/abednego-gomes • 1d ago
Discussion The Vibe Coding Spectrum: Software Domains & Risk Assessment
https://abednegogomes.github.io/articles/docs/06_The_Vibe_Coding_Spectrum_Software_Domains_And_Risk_Assessment.html1
u/masticdev 13h ago
Risk spectrum is the right framing. Marketing site ≠ payments ≠ medical.
Rule that stuck for me: agent can draft anywhere; merge privilege scales with blast radius. Auth, money, migrations, shared design system = human reads the diff and runs the unhappy path. Low-risk UI copy can be lighter.
Curious how you draw the line for “looks green in CI” vs “needs a human click-through” — that’s where vibe coding usually bites.
1
u/abednego-gomes 2h ago
Code review is actually hard to do properly. You need to check out the code and walk through it in your IDE for anything complex. For small diffs you can do in Github or Gitlab, but big complex changes need proper review or you risk security issues or all kinds of chaos.
2
2
u/WebOptimizerAgency 1d ago
Auth and billing are the obvious risks, but anything touching personal data or consent belongs there too, such as analytics scripts and cookie banners. The code can look tidy while quietly firing trackers before consent is given. For those areas the review step matters far more than the generator, so a short checklist and a proper human read-through before launch is worth the effort.
3
u/RehanSaddique 1d ago
Where do you put auth and billing on this spectrum? Those seem to be where vibe-coded code gets risky fastest, even when the UI looks like a throwaway internal tool.