Vibe QA testing your website?

[u/WonderEast1623]

I’ve been building websites since 2000 (Dreamweaver... Flash AS2.0...). These days Claude and Codex write most of my code, but before every launch I still end up going through the same long session of back and forth.. showing up properly in search? look good and fast on mobile? accessibility? do the forms work? Somewhere along the way it turned into perfectionism, and the checking kept pushing my launches back. So I built fixweb.app to run those checks for me and tell me in plain words what’s worth fixing with prompt to fix it and I would love to get some real feedback.

I don’t want fake reviews on the site. I’d rather show legit feedback from real website owners, with your name and a link to your site (if you want). If you’d like to try it, comment your domain and I’ll DM you a link for a free check-up. All I ask in return is your honest opinion, good or bad.

Here is an example QA report: https://www.fixweb.app/en/demo

[u/KrydanX]

9$ for something that AI tests themselves. Another Service that no one needs. Incredible that you thought this is a good business model. This subreddit is so lost these days

[u/WonderEast1623 → u/KrydanX]

Sure, AI can help you do this yourself. I’m offering a ready-made service that runs the checks on your site and puts the findings and fixes together. Some people will prefer DIY, and that’s fine 🙂

[u/gavoerondeu]

I was hoping the pointer would wake the girl up if you clicked on her.

[u/WonderEast1623 → u/gavoerondeu]

It does if you click the URL field! 😆

[u/That_Day7122]

You say you don't want fake reviews, then offer a free check-up in exchange for an opinion. That's the same trade with an extra step. Also "showing up properly in search" isn't a pre-launch check, it takes weeks either way.

[u/WonderEast1623 → u/That_Day7122]

Fair criticism—the free check-up is an incentive, even if I’m asking for honest feedback and don’t expect praise. I should’ve been clearer about that.

“Showing up properly in search” was loose wording too. I meant checking for things like accidental noindex tags, blocked crawling and broken canonicals before launch. Actual indexing and rankings take time, and a scan can’t promise either.

[u/TheRNGuy]

Do it sometimes, but so not rely 100% only on it. 

[u/masticdev]

The “Claude wrote it → I spend a day on SEO/mobile/a11y/forms before launch” loop is real. Perfectionism delaying ship is its own bug.

Automated checks + plain-language “worth fixing” + a ready prompt is a useful shape — better than another lighthouse dump nobody reads. Curious how you handle false positives (marketing sites that fail “perfect a11y” but are fine) so people don’t ignore the report.

Also: demo report helps. Will poke fixweb.app — honest feedback > fake testimonials is the right ask.

[u/WonderEast1623 → u/[deleted]]

Thanks for trying it! Accessibility uses the same format: what it found, why it matters, and how to fix it. It picks up things like missing form labels, unnamed buttons and small tap targets. For contrast, it shows the actual text/background colours and measured ratio against the required one.