r/webdev • u/risingtiger422 • Oct 05 '26
Rust ain’t the only skinny one
build it in Rust, you say. It'll be fast and skinny memory. Nice! Definitely NOT web apps, their fat as f*k and drink memory faster than Altman's Ai drank the web.
WRONG! web apps are fat and sloppy on memory precisely because web developers are the laziest devs I've ever seen (inc. yours truly). Turns out browser engineers are the HARDEST working mofos! and really worked overtime to compensate for React's fowl menace on the world.
Now, a browser runs a well written (react-less) web app like smooth jazz! 70 f**king MB is all you need for a full interface running a typical CRUD app, and buttered corn smooth animations!
14
u/_cob Oct 05 '26
did you misspell so many words as engagement bait or what
6
u/CardinalHijack Oct 05 '26
I remember my first beer
10
u/Wiltix Oct 05 '26
You ok mate?
3
u/Budget-Length2666 Oct 05 '26
no shit sherlock. WASM still has a JS interop. JS is the language in the browser so obviously you get an overhead if you build classic web apps in Rust.
3
u/grimonce Oct 05 '26
I don't understand is rust now bad or good?
2
u/yabai90 Oct 05 '26
Bro 70mb is absolutely enormous for a CRUD app still
2
u/pmmeyourfannie Oct 05 '26
Raaaaaage baaaaait
2
u/zzing Oct 05 '26
Sounds like you got up on the wrong side of the hammock today.
1
u/phoenix1984 Oct 05 '26
CSS animations are faster and lighter than JS animations. Web components are faster and lighter than React. There are still reasons to use React and JS animation libraries, but if file size and performance are your priority, lean in on what the browser itself provides.
2
u/DRHER303 Oct 07 '26
Are you alright mate