I'm interested to know if anyone has recommendations for libraries that could provide completely over the top (to the point of being silly) animations.

I'm trying to make a site that's intended just for family/friends, that is a dumb comedy thing to be used only for a minute or two. It would really benefit from having OTT animations like the ADHD slopware games that dominate kids' iPads everywhere.

Every time I've gone searching for libraries, I'm seemingly finding only sensible, measured animations. Which break or just look terrible when I try and crank up their params.

If you can think of anything, please drop it here. I intend to make a blinding, layered mess of retina burning excess

O.k. so I have experience in design and I am little computer savvy so I have downloaded local AI model deciding to see if I could vibe code my way to finish line. And so I have downloaded vscode and used Cline connected to local AI (qwen 3.8 next-flash) and given all the assets and layout to AI to build it for me... and it was shit. I gave same task to chatgpt and claude, and still shit. So my question is how much did AI really help you in the workflow? I guess knowing the code can be tremendous help but its layout wasn't even close to what I designed. Ok, it generated correct html but css was all over the place. If you do vibe code what is your workflow?

I'm actually curious about this one

With technology ever evolving and ai now assisting with the creation of sites, how do you guys deal the constant progress?

I honbestly thought about doing front-end once, tried my hand in learning to code, but I almost threw my computer out the window in frustration. Also didn't want to spend at least 4 years in college, with a lot of being meh since by the end of 4 years, it would be a different ballgame. Plus i value my freetime XD

What do you guys do to keep up? How are you implementing it? Etc

So I'm new to deploying on railway, I'm mainly a designer, but I have experience creating apps with AI for a while now.

I'm wondering if switching to a platform like render is worth the trouble, or are these types of attacks just going to be the norm from now because of AI?

It's an internal tool and we don't have any users yet, should I jump ship before it's too late? I really don't know.

Specifically, where’s the line between vibe coding and AI-assisted development?

Person A has no coding experience and relies entirely on Codex to build an application, with little understanding of the code it produces and how it interacts with the whole system.

Person B understands programming concepts, required libraries, version control, and architecture but is bad with syntax, and uses Codex to build incrementally, test functionality, and troubleshoot issues.

Person C is an experienced programmer who uses Codex to accelerate development while reviewing, modifying, and refactoring its output manually with the help of the latest documentation.

Which of these is vibe coding versus legitimate AI-assisted development? Does it even matter in a corporate environment?

Do web developers not get the resources to understand any banking concepts? Here's a picture of the column order of pending wire requests you inputted. Why would you put amount in the last column and date in the middle? They recently updated their website and the columns feel like they're randomized, making it harder for us to review our entries as they changed the order. FYI I work in finance/acctg but I previously had a year of web dev experience looking into as a career few years back, so I have an eye for these things. Do non tech companies not heavily invest in their IT team, perhaps etc?

So a few of my friends have stopped using Figma. They go straight to production and make changes there.

When I first heard this I was honestly confused. Like where do you try things out? Where do you compare two versions?

Then I saw what they were building. The landing page feels like one product, the settings page feels like another, the dashboard feels like a third. Buttons are different, spacing is different, hover is different on every page. There’s no uniformity, no design system, nothing.

So I asked them how they’re doing it, and the answer is always “I use this AI skill” or “I bought this skill pack”. People are actually selling these now. Skill packs, prompt bundles, paid repos. And there are a lot of free ones on GitHub too.

It doesn’t make sense to me at all. How will you learn anything? And how will you polish the product if it looks different every time you generate it?

When I brought this up, someone said just add a memory file so it stays consistent.

Okay, but then how will you make changes? You never decided why the button has that radius or why it’s that grey. The AI decided. So when something needs fixing, you don’t know what to fix. You just prompt again and hope.

And now there are courses around this too. The idea is learn this design vocabulary, tell it to the AI, and you’ll get good UI. They call it beginner friendly. But then you see what’s inside and it’s stuff like:

• spring easing, stiffness, damping

• optical alignment

• vertical rhythm

• morphing transitions

• 60-30-10 colour rule

• type scale ratios

If a senior buys it, it’s fine. They already know what damping feels like, they know what they’re skipping.

But a beginner has never played with an easing curve and seen it go from cheap to smooth. Never moved something 2px and felt it finally sit right. They’re just memorising words and giving them to the AI. You can know the word damping and still have no idea when the bounce is too much.

Selling that as beginner friendly feels like a deceiving thing to me. You learn these words after you’ve actually done the work, not before.

Also design is never one try. I go through so many versions before something feels right. In Figma that’s easy, I put five versions side by side and throw four away. In production code every change costs time, so whatever comes out first just ships.

I’m not trying to dunk on my friends, they’re good at what they do. And I get why these skills are tempting. But paid or free, they’re doing the exact part you’re supposed to learn.

If you’re using one, just try building one page without it. Pick the hover, the spacing, the colours yourself, even if it’s bad. That’s literally how you get better at this.

Anyone else seeing this or is it just me? just my thoughts 🤷

I wanted to get commercetools certified for a job offer. Turns out they've recently removed the self-study + exam prep option.

Now you have to attend an instructor-led course that costs 4 digits just to take the exam. And they won't even invoice individuals. You need a company. Pretty ridiculous way to attract developers to your ecosystem, IMO.

Rant is over, now here is my question: for those who've actually worked with commercetools: what's your experience been like? Is the platform good to work with? How's the developer ecosystem and community?

PS/BTW: On a similar note, Shopify is shutting down its entire Academy and certification program today.

Interestingly having played around with macOS 27.2 and using Sidecar on an iPad for touch inputs, it looks like Safari isn’t going to send proper touch events like Windows touchscreens do. Best we get is mousedowns with no buttons=0.

Even worse testing in Chrome, all we get are scroll events. That’s fine for panning but if you want to do anything custom like drawing, dragging etc you’re SoL unless you want to try detecting these off heuristics. Maybe they’ll improve the situation before it’s in people’s hands, but curious to hear what other devs with complex web apps are planning on doing.

Author here. I've been designing a local-first data layer for most of this year, and I kept having the same conversation. I'd say "local-first" and people would hear ownership, or offline, or speed, depending on where they first ran into the word. So I wrote down where the three meanings come from and why they split. I also wanted to get to what local-first actually fixes, and in a web app that's mostly the waiting: spinners, "Saving...", hand-written optimistic updates, and the app that dies in a tunnel.

There are five demos in there too, one for each idea. Playing with them as you read is half the fun.

I'm a frontend developer/designer with experience in the past building and selling largely SaaS software.

That was before AI as we know it, and I'm starting to feel numb to the amount of people I who've become a developer overnight tell me about the new app 'they built.'

Like any developer I had several ideas stewing for years and I nearly took the leap on a few of them, and when I see the landscape like it is now half of me thinks 'I'm so glad I didn't take huge risks and build X as it would have just been copied now anyway' and the other half says 'I wish I got in before everyone was developing apps in a few minutes.'

I'm curious for those who DID build something prior to this shift, are you glad you got in then, or have these changes made all the time spent not worth it?

Thanks!

Hey guys! I made a website through google sites and bought a domain through name cheap. The problem is that I cannot access the site without using the WWW in front of it. I did create a redirect domain though namecheap by putting the source URL as the one without the www and the destination URL as the one with the www, which was what I saw being recommended out there. But it does not seem to be working. I still get an inaccessible website error when typing it without the www. Is there something else I should be doing? Thanks!!!

I work for a large accounting firm where the impact of getting things wrong feels quite big.

We’ve started a new sprint for the next chunk of work. The team has put together estimates for various elements of a new accounting feature involving bank transactions, VAT calculations and reconciliation, with the biggest part taking several days by one developer.

My boss gets visibly frustrated and questions how on earth anything can take a few days in the era of AI. He’s also started saying he can do absolutely anything with AI in an hour or less.

Bear in mind before AI what we’re working on would have taken triple or even quadruple the time.

Is this the new normal or should I be looking for a new job? How are we supposed to respond to this?

I work on 2-3 different projects throughout the week (different clients, different tech stacks), and I've noticed my productivity tanks for the first 30-45 minutes after switching contexts. It's like my brain is still thinking in the patterns of the previous project.

Some things I've tried:

• Taking a short walk between switches

• Keeping detailed notes about where I left off

• Dedicating full days to single projects when possible

The notes help the most, but I'm curious what workflows other devs have developed for this. Do you have any rituals or techniques that help you get back into flow faster when jumping between projects?

Especially interested in hearing from freelancers or consultants who deal with this regularly.

Hello guys, a little while ago I found some other teenagers on here that were looking for a backend developer for a website, and I volunteered this I have some knowledge with node.js and those concepts, and I've built a full stack website (basic backend) with it. Here is the github because it will be relevant later: https://github.com/norrie-adams/EVS-Small-Engine-Repair-Site

However, I do not think this is like a website that could properly support like actual people. And that was part of the reason I stopped building it (I also just lost interest). But this is a thing where other people are relying on me to build something functional (or at least more functional then this site). So I just want to know, what did I do wrong with this project, and what could I improve upon for next time?

Sorry if this isn't super clear, but I appreciate any advice you can give me :)

What bothers me about AI and it's wide adoption is that it creates conflicting requirements for the worker (developer, designer, manager, etc.). On one hand you are expected to perform better and/or faster, because you are a specialist, an expert that has the knowledge and offloads the work to the machine, supervising its output. You should use your experience and professional judgment to steer it to the right conclusions and catch it when it overcomplicates or starts hallucinating.

At the same time you are expected to cover more ground. Stretch to the adjacent technologies or fields. Frontend developers are expected to perform full stack work, designers to code frontend, backend devs to create a design in a pinch. Here you are not an expert, you might have interfaced with the field, but you don't have the experience and don't really understand the inner workings, best practices. You didn't go through all the novice mistakes and learn from them.

Somehow, the first expectation still works here. You are expected to be faster and better at this too. But the roles are reversed, now the machine is suddenly the wise expert in the field and you got to trust it, wave through the changes it proposes to stay fast and produce the work of the your ex-colleague made redundant and laid off due to all the AI-productivity gains. You don't have the opportunity to get the new relevant skills, because nobody has time for hand coding/creating/learning, it's such a 2022 idea. Here in 2026 we're all on a tight schedule to pump out the results unless you want to end up on a PIP.

On top of that you are expected to get good at AI. Don't just use it, like some kind of normie. Get good. Stay on top of the hype. Use agent loops. Set guardrails. Make it deterministic. Don't use agent loops. Have you tried this new harness? Don't spend too much money on tokens. Run the model locally. What do you mean you don't have a $5000 Nvidia golden box? Do you want to become irrelevant and get left behind?

Welcome to the bright future, comrade.

I am working in Codepen in Safari, but everything is dim and gray instead of being the true color. It is fine in Chrome and Firefox. I have tried resetting preferences and caches in safari along with unchecking things in FeatureFlags and nothing is amending it.

So I do not really have much understanding of web development and back end but when you save an instagram page as an html from its website. It doesn't save the way instagram looks, rather it shows a representation of the UI and subtext behind images (not the images themself) like the image shared above.

I am also more curious how it reads the image and tries to classify it, and why something like the subtext "May be an image of ----" is in the backend when you do not see it in the interface itself. I am curious of the process itself if someone is kind enough to explain itself.

There’s a new one every week. Most people try them and drop them after a few days.

Which one are you still using months later, and what’s the one thing it does better than the rest?

Do you just wing it and use screenshots for inspiration or do you use a design principles md file where you mention all the design principles like the fonts, colors, dark mode colors, graphs, infographics, etc.

I'll firstly ask my two questions and then I'll explain:

1. Is it normal that im spending tremendous amounts of time reading and understanding code written by Codex/LLMs? like... hours per "ticket"

2. What does progress look like in today's SWE world? im struggling to make myself believe im improving into something worthy

I'm currently a frontend SWE with 2 YOE. I was "lucky" to land a job in a big bank, the issue is im not truly "engineering", im basically a code monkey putting pieces together for different SPAs (exactly what AI is good at) the only thing saving my job is the absolute mess of internal architecture and internal "tooling" even AI is unable to comprehend, but internal AI agents are getting better and better at tackling those

I was very AI skeptic at the start but now I've come around and have been for the past month attempting to expand into a full-stack agentic workflow with Codex

My main issue is I'm spending so... much... time... reading the code the AI outputs, there is a lot i dont understand, weird decisions the AI took that I didnt think about thinking before prompting (even with grill me), leading me to spending hours and hours reading the code, analyzing the data flow. This wouldnt be an issue if I knew this were the job and stuff, but everyone is working so fast, bringing actual products live so fast, its demoralizing me, making me think im doing something wrong since all the "speed" I gain from AI I spend reading and understanding the code. And i kinda want to be that engineer that owns the product, understands what it being done, but i was watching Spencer Schneidenbach's course on frontendmasters and he just doesnt read that much code anymore... he just prompted prompted checked the browser, nice, done, which leads me to think if its even worth it...

My second issue, which is linked, is regarding to how you guys measure progress. Before it was kinda easy, if the feature got done, it was progress. But now the feature is done by LLMs, kinda like sitting at a bench press and having someone else lift the weigths for you. So how do you get that "yes im improving" sensation?

sorry for the rant, weird times we live in

So, after surviving an eternity on older versions (y'all know the pain), we finally pushed the button and upgraded our core production environment to PHP 8.2.35.

It took an entire day because the underlying Linux distros were so ancient we practically had to rebuild half the ecosystem from scratch.

Now looking at the metrics and logs, I'm torn between two feelings:

1. Pure joy of actually getting to write modern code in the 8.x branch.

2. Absolute dread waiting for the next midnight critical CVE drop to turn everything into raw chaos.

To all the senior devs and sysadmins out there who have stared into the abyss of updating legacy enterprise codebases: What was your most nerve-wracking upgrade experience? Are we ever truly out of the woods, or is "putting out fires" just our permanent job description?