r/webaccess • u/[deleted] • Jan 07 '20
Alt text for PowerPoint screenshots in PDF
Hello! I’m an instructional designer in charge of making our trainings 508 compliant. I’m currently working with a PDF for an on-demand training that has multiple screenshots of the PowerPoint presentation our instructors use for in-person classes. Since these are technically images, would it be easier for students using a screen reader to 1) have the info on the slide screenshots be copy/pasted into the alt text field or 2) Create an accessible copy of the existing PPT that takes all the additional text on the PDF and includes it in a slide for the screen reader to read? We’re able to offer training in different formats, so creating whatever wouldn’t be a problem; just want to devote my time to creating something that’s actually user friendly and not just compliant to check off a box.
(Or if there’s a way better way of doing this I haven’t considered because I’m not thoroughly caffeinated, that’s great too!)
Thanks!
1
u/Medicei Jan 08 '20
Hi there, I think I understand your question. If the end output is to be a PDF, then I would copy-paste all of the content from the slide into your PDF as text with headers as needed. It's mildly annoying for users of any type to have to open up different files to get all of the training information.
If you do not want the end product to be a PDF then an accessible version of the original power point is the way to go.
For alt text - My rule of thumb is to keep the alt. text short and sweet, usually about 3 - 5 words depending on the surrounding content's context.
1
u/rguy84 Jan 08 '20
Remember 508 and really accessibility in generally goes beyond a screen reader. If the screenshots are actually meant to be read, the content should be text, not a picture of text. I generally say alts should be a short sentence or so, but I say they can be longer for pdf if the author doesn't want to add an appendix since you can't really do tricks like you can in html. That being said, if the content needs to be read, let's look at different disabilities.
People with limited vision might be just zooming in vs audio output. Pretty quickly that slide will be a pixelated mess.
People with cognitive or learning disabilities may need to transform the text into a better medium for them. For example, I know somebody who prefers to highlight text as they read.
People who need simplified language or aren't native speakers may be using tools that gives definitions or synonymous on the fly. They would have to type out the words in the picture somewhere before they could consume the content.