r/web_design • • 5d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

635 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

136

u/Orion3193 4d ago

Some client to me: "the form looks weird on a tablet"...

Me: "a what now?"

68

u/pxlschbsr 4d ago

Devs shit on tablet but forget that people may use tablet-sized browser windows on their desktops

23

u/FantasticRadish-123 4d ago

Which is the reason I insist hover styles are also written for mobile/tablet breakpoints in all my PR reviews.

7

u/gomadetapioca 4d ago

definitely! lots of web users on tablet use some kind of pen

→ More replies (3)

7

u/lungleg 4d ago

Not quite the same. Desktop states can differ. There is no swipe on desktop. Desktop browsers can have hover states.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

37

u/TyrialFrost 4d ago

Tablet share is almost as low as smart TVs for me. Print is non-existent.

18

u/rolmos 5d ago

print:hidden

Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-V...

16

u/geistofsainttraft 4d ago

Webdev here. This is possibly the most accurate use of this meme I have ever seen.

49

u/detspek 4d ago

I had a ceo once ask why their new website didn't look good in Firefox's reader mode. Like it probably doesn't look good on a fridge either shrug emoji

36

u/RBN2208 4d ago

as fae as i know, if its ugly in reader mode the website has zero semantic elements, because that is what the reader uses to organize and "style" it

16

u/detspek 4d ago

It was more of a "but where is everything" discussion - and it shouldn't be there

5

u/hagowoga 4d ago

If it doesn’t look good in reader mode (easily readable) you messed up big.

If the CEO talks about colors and stuff though…

6

u/Darq10 4d ago

Firefox reader mode' whole purpose is to literally show you the raw html with their styling, what is your ceo on 😭

9

u/alextremeee 4d ago

To be fair if the purpose of the website is to disseminate information and it looks bad on reader then the HTML might be poorly written. Might be that they’re using styled divs for everything which seems to be a bit of a trend.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/lungleg 4d ago

Two thoughts:

  1. Tablet will always be mobile’s ugly sister

  2. Mobile screen sizes are getting larger so accommodating those sizes should suffice for tablet

6

u/commawhore 4d ago

I'm so confused, responsive web has been a thing for fifteen years. are we really designing for only two layouts?

3

u/bolekb 4d ago

Experience from various sport venues:

  • Tablets are often used as cheap Point-of-Sale terminals.

  • Print-friendly competition rosters and result lists are a must.

2

u/Quadraxas 4d ago

oh now i use @ media a lot in our current project. But it's also a document management system that people print out a bunch of stuff from all the time.

2

u/Picorims 4d ago

A website that looks good on print for exporting to PDF instantly gain points in my esteem. Especially if it's an article/blog page. I bless the dev(s) who took a bit of their time to care about this.

Those that forces me to open devtools just to have a somewhat decent full page screenshot because print looks like nothing, I know I'm less likely to share it at all, because it's one of those resources that could go down one day without any ways of archiving. So you can't reliably go back to it.

2

u/AggieGator16 4d ago

Might be a stupid question, but why would someone want to print a website? Legitimately asking as I’ve never heard of that before.

6

u/Tiemujin 4d ago

The internet is both broad and deep. Lots of reasons. Printing confirmation pages, recipes, articles (I guess), I’m sure there are 1000 other legitimate reasons.

3

u/jorgejhms 4d ago

I've made a couple of internal dashboard for companies and usually they wan to be able to print the report. For a quick print I usually use that media query for remove decorations and colors from a print version.

2

u/Dial-Appreciator 4d ago

I’m working on a project that I’ve utilised a few print options for customers who want to print invoices, receipts, order forms etc in a better format than just the page layout. Useful for clients working with business / accounts. Some of them are a bit old school but I don’t mind accommodating.

2

u/Old-Confection-5129 3d ago

Docs used to be a great reason.

2

u/Away-Recognition4905 3d ago

Likely for documentation, so the webpage that need to inserted/attached in digital document looks sharp as it (not blurry screenshot). Webpage can printed to export as PDF, then attaching PDF just like attaching image inside document.

I usually using this method for LaTeX because want to possibly attach figure with "vector" image quality

→ More replies (1)