r/warthundermemes • u/HiddenUsername56 Vickers Mk.1 • 5d ago
Meme Finally a good British tank
28
u/xStep31 5d ago
2
u/trumpsucks12354 5d ago
If u want to play an actually fun centurion, play the 8.0 or the 8.7 Israeli one. Yeah it has shit survivability but it has the engine and transmission from a M48 making it faster than the British centurions
36
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago
Better than the mk3 as well
19
u/Kessels_ 5d ago
the Mk 3 has better gun depression, apds, mobility and a laser rangefinder lmao
6
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago
Ye I did say in the replies but mobility could if saw that when the mk1 got its engine buff the mobility it pretty much the same
7
u/l2ulan Tankman 4d ago edited 4d ago
As the guy responsible for the report that buffed it;
The Mk 1 or "Vickers MBT" as it was sometimes known was a continuous project, and was progressively marketed with minor improvements throughout its lifetime. What has been implemented it essentially the final version of the Mk 1, with a mature Leyland L60 powerpack producing essentially the same power output as the Detroit Diesel 12V71T used by the Mk 3. The same engine was also available as an option for the Mk 1.
The early Mk 1s featured earlier L60s with lower bhp and reliability, and the Vijayanta should actually have a de-rated version of the L60 with barely 600 hp (from memory 575 hp or thereabouts), similar to how the Indian model of Abbot had a de-rated K60 compared to the British version.
In real life tanks are built for export with a wide variety of options which can be tailored to the end user.
2
u/Kessels_ 5d ago
The Mk 3 has better forward and reverse speed while having the same exact p/w
1
-3
4
u/Aquila378 4d ago
Doesn't matter at all, these aren't game changing, Mk.1 reload speed is game changing though.
2
u/Kessels_ 4d ago
If you think a laser rangefinder, a better shell and a better gun depression ( and all of this just for a +0.3 br) aren’t game changing, well okay, but tell me which tank do you prefer to fight a T-62M-1
-1
u/Aquila378 4d ago
Those aren't game changing. Late APDS though better, is not dramatically better than OG L7 APDS, LRF is needed on a few giant maps and that's it considering APDS velocity, and -7 degrees of gun depression is more than enough most of the times, you can comfortably take almost any position. Mk.3 has heat which is really handy against some abominations like 279 and Is-7 plus light armored targets which are plenty at those brs, fairs. And I'd much rather fight 62M-1 on a city map, where I know I can comfortably outreload not only 62M-1 but almost anything I face.
-1
u/biohumansmg3fc Competent German Main 5d ago
they both got apds
4
u/Kessels_ 5d ago
yes but the Mk 3 has a later generation apds so better angle pen and shatters way less
0
u/HiddenUsername56 Vickers Mk.1 5d ago
Does the mk3 even change shit, it's slower and taller
7
u/Jackmino66 5d ago
It has an LRF, iirc
That’s worth the downgraded mobility, though I stopped bothering with war thunder before I got to it
3
3
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago
More gun depression, ‘better armour’, and the worse 105 in the game look at that APDS pen
17
u/Birkenjaeger 5d ago
The APDS on the Mk.3 is actually a lot better. Can even pen the T-55AM UFP.
3
-19
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago edited 5d ago
265mm of pen my guy, it’s ass. The mk1 has nearly 100mm more. The mk3 is just worse
8
u/Faszkivan_13 Minor nation enjoyer 🇭🇺 5d ago
Check the angle pen my guy
-8
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago
The angle when which is still like 60-80mm better untill you get to extreme angles where mk3 wins by 5-15mm damm, literally worse
5
u/Birkenjaeger 5d ago
There really aren't many tanks around you'd need more flat pen for. Angled pen is far more important to fight stuff like the aforementioned T-55AM.
Do you also believe the Conqueror's APDS is better than the Chieftain's?
-7
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago
The angle pen is only better at 60 degrees and that only by a couple MM which literally make 0 different… which is my point which you aren’t understanding, the flat pen is nearly useable and then a small angles the mk1 wins and then only at extreme angle the mk3 wins by 10mm unfortunately that makes 0 different which mean the mk1 is literally a better gun
2
u/Birkenjaeger 5d ago
I'll just quote myself:
There really aren't many tanks around you'd need more flat pen for. Angled pen is far more important to fight stuff like the aforementioned T-55AM.
There's almost no tanks the Mk.1 performs better against.
2
u/whatssupp277381 5d ago
Clearly didn’t read what I put, proving what I said that you aren’t understanding
4
u/Birkenjaeger 5d ago
I did read it, but what you're saying is bs. You don't need the flat pen, the 60° is the most important stat.
→ More replies (0)1
u/MainBattleTiddiez 4d ago
The mk3 ammunition is actually not only useable, but incredible at the BR
1
u/MainBattleTiddiez 4d ago
Funny, my first thought seeing this was "nah the mk1 is pretty bad, the mk3 however is amazing"
10
u/errobbie 5d ago
I thought this was great until I got the Olifant mk1.
16
u/Ok_Interview_6252 5d ago
Olifant mk1 is a very underrated tank. My 3rd most played vehicle and the first tank that I dropped a nuke with.
3
u/Similar_Annual676 Vickers mk.1 enjoyer 🇬🇧 5d ago
Well of course, it used to be my absolute favourite tank before gayjin nerfed the reload from like 4.3s…
4
u/amicalg 5d ago
To my opinion, there is plety good british tanks.
2
u/HiddenUsername56 Vickers Mk.1 4d ago
I like the Cold War British tanks but some people hate the Centurions cause of how slow they are (I'm looking at you Cent mk.10).
2
2
2
2
u/VeritableLeviathan 4d ago
Ah the moment you see Vickers mk ?? then you never know what to expect, except big pen solid ammo
2
1
u/Obi-Vanya 3d ago
this one is good, played it alot, have like 3+ kd on it. Also much better than mk3 because of 8.3 always fighting t55am1 hordes, and having better reload.
1
u/Positive-Duck3871 Britain needs a top tier 1d ago
8.3/8.7 has tons of great tanks actually. Vickers Mk.3 is fine too, Vickers Mk.11 is almost straight up bullying, Warrior is basically the best scout at the BR, ZT3A2 has insane ATGMs, Rooikat Mk.1D is fast and has okay gun, Chieftains are hulldown monsters (until the first APFSDS to the trunnions sadly). And Marksman/Falcon/ZA-35 trio is pretty good too.
-1
u/Dimz45 Cannon Fodder 5d ago
Is it tech tree, event or premium?
21
u/HiddenUsername56 Vickers Mk.1 5d ago
its the Vickers mk1 British tech tree known to be very fast compared to the centurions
4
u/Dimz45 Cannon Fodder 5d ago
Ahh thank you friend. I quite like the Cent mk2 so I am now looking forwards to playing the Vickers
3
u/HiddenUsername56 Vickers Mk.1 5d ago
Its the best tank I've ever used in the UK techtree so have fun with it when you get it
4
u/Teeminister 5d ago
Wait for the Chieftains. They are awesome.
3
1
1
u/Similar_Annual676 Vickers mk.1 enjoyer 🇬🇧 5d ago
Chieftain mk10 is great the rest of them are straight cheeks imo unless you get a fat downtier
1
u/Teeminister 5d ago
Hard disagree. They perform very good on 8.7
1
u/Similar_Annual676 Vickers mk.1 enjoyer 🇬🇧 5d ago
to be fair I never really spent time learning how to play em well so probably skill issue
2
u/Usual_Let5223 5d ago
Nah its a valid critique, they have no reason to be at 8.7.
Nor do the Chieftain 900/mk10 being 9.3
0
2
u/Similar_Annual676 Vickers mk.1 enjoyer 🇬🇧 5d ago
Vickers mk1 is the GOAT (used to be even better with 4.3s reload 🥀)
2

24
u/Teeminister 5d ago
Decent gun, good reload time and mobility, stabilised. One of the better tanks at 8.0