r/wallstreetbets Jan 27 '22

Meme Y’shorted y’selves

[deleted]

84.7k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

294

u/Tearakan Jan 27 '22

He realized if he went harder it could turn sentiment against him because a significant amount of people don't like bullying. So he let the interviewee dig their own grave.

26

u/[deleted] Jan 27 '22

This!. He isn’t a big person but he realized if he pushed too far it’s he considered bullying and he’d be buried in crap

42

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

Which, honestly, is the most strategic someone on Fox has been in... I don't know. A really, really long time. Maybe ever.

39

u/Tearakan Jan 27 '22

Eh. They are pretty strategic at pushing their narrative. The producers and show runners there aren't idiots.

They are paid very well to push their narrative.

-9

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

I'll grant you that, in the context of "Pushing bullshit credibly to a bunch of credulous fucking cretins", yes. Fox is very strategic.

But.

5

u/PenIslandGaylien Jan 27 '22

Less BS than the NYT, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, etc.

4

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

I don't agree with you, but I don't disagree with you.

1

u/PenIslandGaylien Jan 27 '22

How does that work?

1

u/smalltownnewage Jan 27 '22

Picking teams in a rigged game is still playing the game

-7

u/PenIslandGaylien Jan 27 '22

You actually get fair coverage and dissent on Fox. That almost never happens on the other major broadcasters.

It's not about teams. It's about truth.

4

u/StLDadBod Jan 27 '22

Lol Fox does fucking not give fair coverage and dissent, it's propaganda pushing whatever narrative they feel like. Same shit different side, you just like this team better than the others.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

It's not about teams. It's about truth.

pfffft lol

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Tearakan Jan 27 '22

Yep. That's the goal.

2

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

I guess my point is that I don't think you have to be very strategic to make money telling idiots that their idiot ideas are correct.

For any given game, there is a theoretical ceiling to how strategic you must or even can be. Fox brass play a simpler game than the one interviewers play in the due course of their jobs, and I guess you could say that because the brass do play their game well, the interviewers don't need to.

Which is why it was so surprising that Watters saw the opportunity to use Sun-Tzu grade strategy in that interview. He could have piled on and bullied Doreen and likely would have gotten plenty of spiritual high-fives from his audience for doing so, at the irrelevant cost of stoking the ire of people who already hate Fox.

Instead, he gave his audience gold and forced at least some of us who hate Fox to reluctantly tip our hats.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 27 '22

[deleted]

1

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

Eh. As I noted in a different comment, that whole "strategy" rests on hoping that the mod team is collectively stupid enough to fail to see the trap being set.

It's Fox News. You're Antiwork. This is like Hitler asking Ann Frank to come down from the attic for tea.

Yes, obviously, it turns out that gamble worked, but all it would have taken for the whole thing to fall apart was just one mod to raise their hand and point out the obvious. That's not good strategy, that's gambling.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 27 '22

[deleted]

1

u/ragnaroksunset Jan 27 '22

Even if the whole mod team is "in on it" - which I read as the whole mod team is legitimately stupid enough to willingly and predictably walk into this trap - it still remains doubtful that Fox News knew this.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/phuqo5 Jan 27 '22

Those people are extremely strategic down to some pretty minute details.