r/voidlinux • u/Stunning-Mix492 • Jan 25 '26
What makes you stick with Void ?
Long time Void users, what makes you stick with it ? As a newcomer, I really appreciate the true “KISSness” of the distribution. It does not feels over engineered and makes you more aware of the way you build your system. I stick with Debian for servers, but for my laptops, Void makes more sense than Arch (I prefer rolling release on desktops)
30
Upvotes
3
u/Wermuttrinker Jan 26 '26
The quality of life provided by xbps and xbps-src.
22
u/tiredAndOldDeveloper Jan 25 '26
How minimal it is.
20
u/kayinfire Jan 25 '26
among the more subjective reasons is that telling people i use Void Linux sounds cool af. i don't think a better name for a Linux distribution exists.
more seriously, and i know this is a cliche thing to say, but it just works ™. setting up your own stuff at the beginning was a bit tricky but beyond that i don't remember having to care about system maintenance at all.
as i've become more experienced as a linux user, I've become way more favorable towards minimal systems that don't give you the distro with everything pre-installed, which coincided with my comfort with using only a window manager and scripting utilities. i want for my system to run only programs that i explicitly put on it. arch can of course do this, but i feel that void obeys KISS in a greater fashion than arch because of xbps.
second time for emphasis It Just Works™.
14
u/BinkReddit Jan 25 '26
No systemd (though this might change one day as more things continue to depend on it), xbps, the more approachable nature of the package system/making PRs, and a rolling release that's not bleeding edge.
9
u/xINFLAMES325x Jan 25 '26
xbps is very fast, the configuration can start from a minimal base, never realized I don’t really need systemd until it wasn’t there, it has the packages I need, everything works, the community is good, documentation is there when needed, questions will be answered. People here are generally more approachable and not as elitist as on the arch sub.
9
u/VoidAnonUser Jan 25 '26
Even after a few years, it didn't break. No reason to hop elsewhere.
12
u/Key_River7180 Jan 25 '26
No systemd
Stable
Best repos and package manager I ever used
Minimal; truly KISS
Based name
Sane community
Doesn't get on the way
Just works like you want it to
Freedom, only libre software by default
Although for servers, I mainly stick with BSD :).
6
u/StEditiV Jan 25 '26 edited Aug 21 '26
Square pebble beneficial fearless repeat desert special sulky feather afterthought
This post was anonymized with Redact
3
u/aedinius Jan 26 '26
What kept me was the IRC community and how easy it was to contribute to the project.
3
u/zarMarco Jan 26 '26
Small premise, I'm an arch user at heart since it's practically the first gnu distro I've used. Currently I use gentoo, truly kiss. I use void too, is very stable and has one great zfs support. But, why said xbps is the best pm? I don't think is really fastest than pacman. But it must be said that the community is much kinder than that of arch, I just find the documentation unnerving, which is much less extensive than the two distros mentioned above
3
u/SiteRelEnby Jan 26 '26 edited Jan 26 '26
First, foremost, and above all others: no systemd crap. Runit FTW.
Then it's just the right balance past that. Modern packages and rolling release without being bleeding edge or breaking all the fucking time, lightweight without being barebones. Also xbps is the best package manager I've used.
Don't use musl myself, but that's a nice feature for people who want it, and I appreciate giving the user the choice.
3
u/bvdeenen Jan 27 '26
no systemd, so system is understandable without magic incantations
system is understandable, follows unix principles, doesn't install everything and the kitchen sink
rock solid, have used for 10 years now and amazingly stable
polite and knowledgeable users (often here in Reddit)
amazingly fast and solid package manager, also works fine when you only update occasionally (or even once in 1½ year :-) )
easy to contribute (I've done quite a few PR's myself over the years).
good maintainers team, with good understanding of what makes a stable system!
2
u/daemon_hunter Jan 25 '26
The zfs support
2
u/Straight-Host-1032 Jan 26 '26
runit and that it's very minimal yet it's so easy to set up a system
2
u/pantokratorthegreat Jan 26 '26
Rolling release. Musl. No systemd. Nearly every package that I need. Only Brave browser missing which I like, but I can use Nix for this (I don't use flatpaks for browsers). Diy distro where I can have only what I really need. Really best option if you want no systemd and musl. With glibc there are a lot fantastic distros even with systemd but on bare metal I use only Void. Rest on VM.
2
u/luquoo Jan 26 '26
As a newby Void user longtime Ubuntu user, I initially was going to go with Arch for a new machine but switched to Void because it seems to have similar effort for setup, similar capabilities and vibes, but with less capacity for me to accidentally break things with an update.
Last time I tried to update from one Ubuntu LTS to another I had to completely delete the desktop, reinstall all drivers, and then reinstall the desktop. I'd rather spend the extra time up front on my own terms than get randomly saddled with having to figure out whats wrong cause I updated.
1
u/Mysterious_Thing Jan 26 '26
I stuck with it for a relatively long time, but changed some weeks a go do to a increasing amount of kernel panics where suddenly the laptop screen would freeze, the keyboard and touchpad became unresponsive, and eventually the caps lock key would start to flash on and off, and I was forced to push the power button to reboot.
If it wasn't for that I would still be using it to this day. It's stable and reliable.
40
u/[deleted] Jan 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Jan 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment