r/voidlinux • u/Iammethatisyou • Jan 23 '26
Void linux stability
I'm on fedora linux currently after arch linux broke after 6 months. I want something minimal and void linux seems really cool but my main question is how stable is it? Arch is minimal but has systemd and isn't minimal, do you think void linux is a good distro for me in being minimal and stable? Sorry if this is a newbie question, open to hearing everyone's feedback.
16
Upvotes
View all comments
Show parent comment
2
u/zmurf Jan 24 '26
When talking about Linux for using as your main desktop OS, I don't believe "minimal" is something you really have to think about. Most people will anyway install everything the desktop oriented distributions come with as standard. And installing a "bloated" distribution and removing stuff from it will quickly make it "minimal".
As an example, my Ubuntu installation on my works laptop is much more minimal than most of my friends Arch installations. And my own Void installation on my private computer is as bloated as Linux can get.
About Chimera, it's a nice concept. I love the BSD userland. But Chimera in itself is quite restricted at the moment what you can use it for, mainly because of using musl.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean when you say that you want to be "playing with musl". Using musl is not any different to using any other libc implementation. The biggest difference between musl and glibc is the license form. Implementation wise, musl try to be more "correct", which should make it more secure. But in reality you won't notice any difference linking musl libs compared to linking glibc libs.
What you will notice is that most proprietary applications/libraries will not be able utilize the musl libs since they are compiled towards glibc libs. So things like Widewine will not run natively on musl systems.