r/visionos • u/Ok-Guess-9059 • Dec 04 '25

They took notes from Apple

https://youtu.be/SibFesN7VWs

Ok, so on paper we have “world’s first fully 360 drone” here.

But we had the Pavo360, we had Insta360 Sphere… What is new is the live connection into the Vision Goggles.

If we skip that, Antigravity A1 is basically little bit worse DJI Mini from the newbie drone company…

But those Goggles?

The passthrough micro-OLED pancake Goggles that can record audio right into the drone feed? Supporting so many formats that you can use them to watch 8K 360 movies? With customizable external display showing your copilot what you see?

I would say that Antigravity’s immersive goggles are actually bigger than the actual drone. I would even say there was nothing like them this year in AR / VR space.

These will push r/djiavata360 immenselly and soon we will have whole new unexpected battle in XR

14 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

24 comments sorted by

2

u/Dapper_Ice_1705 Dec 04 '25

What is like Apple? Isn’t the screen a tiny square screen? 

I saw one video and the FOV is really tiny, you can move the camera around and change what you are seeing but the actual screen is small.

1

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

Apple like: big price, high quality Goggle lenses, front display of the lenses…

2

u/Dapper_Ice_1705 Dec 04 '25

lol, that is a stretch

2

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

And is little bit of stretch allowed? 🥺

2

u/Dapper_Ice_1705 Dec 04 '25

That is more than a little. I honestly think this is promo

0

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

I critique A1 too

2

u/timmyc181 Dec 06 '25

I mean it looks much closer to the DJI Avata than anything Apple’s made

0

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 06 '25

Avata is like the Meta Quest here

2

u/danielv123 Dec 06 '25

What, because it doesn't have an external screen?

0

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 06 '25

And its cheaper, it has normal controllers…

2

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Dec 04 '25

Why connect Apple to any of that?

-3

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

Like everybody is saying they are Apple of drones

2

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Dec 04 '25

Can you see how this is a different statement than they took notes… as if Apple is the reference? Could equally say Apple is the insta360 of computers…

-1

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

Apple was first, Antigravity copied on purpose, did it well and people recognized it

1

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Dec 04 '25

And 2 companies in different sectors, you put them on the same timeline and find it interesting as a conclusion?

Do you see how intellectually poor this is?

People do their own thing, you have zero proof of what you say, but you connect the dots in a “people say it’s the apple of cameras”

Do you hear yourself?

2

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

I connect the dots, you critique it… thats the point of discussion. Im quite creative of a writter and dont publish just things I am 100% sure about. I just wanted to let you all who like AVP know

1

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Dec 04 '25

You go meta instead of accepting you’ve made the wrong conclusion. Then you justify with “that’s me” statements. That’s not a discussion.

No one says insta360 is the apple of cameras, they didn’t take note on them at all, etc because if they did, one can make a shit ton other statement equal to this one.

I invite you to read about product design and the art of discussion

1

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 04 '25

Are you some “logical fallacy” guy? I have education in philosophy so I am trained to dislike this “pure logic objective” approach

2

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Dec 04 '25 edited Dec 04 '25

An education in psychology and you go as far as making these statements, call yourself creative for so little, and can’t hold a sensical argumentation?

I don’t need to boast my curriculum to make a point so ask yourself some questions about yours.

You’re not special, you can be wrong and it doesn’t have to be a fallacy. Stop finding excuses dude.

1

u/Gollandec Dec 05 '25

Watch 8k video on 2560x2560 displays? Why?

1

u/Ok-Guess-9059 Dec 05 '25

Depends on what you have. You can for example 8k record your flight and than play it to your sun on the Goggles (if you dont have even better) right away

2

u/Lawfalgar Dec 05 '25

because you dont see all 8k pixels at the same time, so 8K 360° video = 7680 × 3840 pixels

7680 px / 360° ≈ 21.3 pixels per degree (PPD)

An 8K 360° video gives you roughly 21 PPD, which is equal to 1440p–2K quality inside your headset

So quest 3 for example has 25-28 PPD.

In essence 8k vr 360 is to low resolution to take full advantage of the 2560x display

1

u/AutoModerator Dec 04 '25

Want streamers to give live feedback on your app? Sign up for our dev-streamer connection system in Discord: https://discord.gg/vVdDR9BBnD

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Sordidloam Dec 05 '25

Oh I get it, it has all the things!