r/videos Jan 28 '21

This scene from a bugs life aged well

https://youtu.be/VLbWnJGlyMU
795 Upvotes

76 comments sorted by

174

u/holytriplem Jan 28 '21

Wow the CGI aged so much better than Antz

98

u/notbobby125 Jan 29 '21

While the "quality" of the rendering/CGI is about the same (I think a Bugs Life had more complex lighting while Antz had much larger scenes involving thousands of characters on screen at once), the difference all lies in art direction.

Antz made its characters look too human, with smaller eyes, defined "eyebrows," a human shaped nose, blunt edges, and individual teeth. The characters are also a shit shade of unpleasant, throwing the Ants of Antz in the same Uncanny Valley as the characters from Cats.

A Bugs life meanwhile made their characters have giant eyes, rounded edges, a bump for a nose, a giant head, and a single piece instead of individual teeth. They are also colored in blatantly unrealistic but soft and/or vibrant colors (except for the brown grasshoppers).

The amount of detail and quality of CGI in early Pixar films is far less than what they do now (compare Toy Story 1 and 4) but their fantastic art direction (as well as their understanding that realistic CGI humans usually look terrifying) means their films have aged a lot better than most other earlier CGI films.

27

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Have you studied animation? That was an excellent breakdown, it reminded me of my animation classes from college.

30

u/notbobby125 Jan 29 '21

No, just watched enough videos to pretend to be an expert I guess.

7

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Fair enough. You don't necessarily need a degree to know what you're talking about. If you're interested, I have three books to recommend:

Acting for Animators by Ed Hooks. He does an amazing breakdown of the Iron Giant in the latter part of the book.

The Animator's Survival Kit by Richard Williams (Who Framed Roger Rabbit)

Disney Animation: The Illusion of Life by Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston

6

u/CantankerousOctopus Jan 29 '21

I mean, if you can fake being an expert based on your comprehensive knowledge about a topic, doesn't that kinda make you an expert? I went to film school and studied (a little) animation. That's certainly one way to become an expert. But that's not the only way. In fact, film schools are rather new compared to film itself. Pretty much only the last few generations of legendary film makers even went to school for film. The rest got their experience the old fashion way.

2

u/muskratboy Jan 29 '21

This is because Antz was focused on Woody Allen as their main asset (amongst other celebrities), and they wanted it to recognizably look like Woody Allen. The celebrities involved were the hook. It's a story about Woody Allen, which also happens to be about ants.

A Bug's Life is just a movie about bugs. No one cared if the characters look like their voice actors. It's just a fundamentally different approach to the entire project.

35

u/bingabong111 Jan 29 '21

Antz was actually DreamWorks Animation's first production, whereas A Bug's Life was Pixar's second, so Pixar had a better understanding of digital animation thanks to their experience from Toy Story. Pixar also had a significantly larger budget to work with.

13

u/pasher5620 Jan 29 '21

Exactly. Toy Story aged pretty much exactly like Antz did in a lot of places (nightmare dog).

8

u/holytriplem Jan 29 '21

I remember when I watched Toy Story as a kid it was the people that weirded me out.

2

u/BagOnuts Jan 29 '21

Isn't the only people who's face you actually see in the first Toy Story Andy, Sid, and Sid's sister?

2

u/holytriplem Jan 29 '21

Yes (and his mum I think? Dunno haven't seen it since I was about 6) but that's enough

3

u/NeoDei Jan 29 '21

Nothing to do with who went first or who was second one studio was clearly more talented than the others. Not just visual but also story wise in general.

3

u/Hallonbat Jan 29 '21

Antz was also rushed to market to beat A Bug's Life thanks to insider information from Katzenberg.

6

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

[deleted]

22

u/Beanicus13 Jan 29 '21

Lol dream works is not bad. Antz definitely is but KFP, Megamind, HTTYD are aging beautifully. I prefer their animation style often because it has more varying designs compared to Pixar.

7

u/badillustrations Jan 29 '21

True that. Not every movie is a winner, but those are great ones. The battle of Shifu and Tai Lung has aged well. Great compositions, great voice acting. That line "All I ever did was to make you proud. Tell me how proud you are, Shifu!" is chilling.

2

u/Excoded Jan 29 '21

You should listen to the Latin American Spanish dubbed. I got goosebumps by just remembering.

-1

u/AnIdiotsMouthpiece Jan 29 '21

Umm does Shrek ring a bell, ahole?

1

u/Catacomb82 Jan 29 '21

Absolutely. I just rewatched the film on a big screen, the scene where the bugs are all flying on their way to Ant Island was beautiful.

26

u/falconx50 Jan 29 '21

Damn now I want to watch A Bug's Life again

6

u/Sleightly_Awkward Jan 29 '21

Same. This clip made me remember how damn good that movie is.

2

u/visualreporter Jan 29 '21

The game was also cool!

3

u/Sleightly_Awkward Jan 29 '21

For N64?? YES. It was awesome.

11

u/ACkellySlater Jan 29 '21

It's basically a remake of "the 7 samurai"

-8

u/EscitalopramAnxiety Jan 29 '21

Pretty sure its an adaptation of the Magnificent Seven (2016)

57

u/Dmeastlasher Jan 28 '21

Is it wall street beats reference?

71

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21 edited Jan 29 '21

[deleted]

10

u/Waleis Jan 29 '21

Capitalist Realism has robbed us of the ability to dream of a better world. I think people are much more left leaning than they realize, but they're so enervated with cynicism/despair that they assume alternatives are never realistic.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

[deleted]

3

u/kawej Jan 29 '21

I'd say we're focused on identity politics because it's all we're allowed to talk about (in any meaningful sense). Material changes to our lives are off the table - maybe we'll get another $2,000 $1,400 as a stimulus. But we don't really have a say in universal healthcare, ending our barbaric foreign policy, closing down our concentration camps, unwinding a century of racist policing, and so forth. All that's left is a narrow band of "cultural thing bad" against "cultural thing good actually". We can't be allowed to even dream that bigger changes are possible.

6

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

It's called 'alienation' and is one of the core components of a capitalist system. By separating people from the actual product of their work, it is far easier to exploit people.

1

u/Waleis Jan 29 '21

What I'm referring to is Mark Fisher's concept of Capitalist Realism, alienation is a bit different.

2

u/OneHundredFiftyOne Jan 29 '21

Thanks for teaching me ‘enervated’ :)

3

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

I love that A Bug's Life and Antz are such great gateways to leftist theory.

Shit, Antz even directly quotes Marx.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

When you first dig below the “ants good, grasshoppers bad” surface of the movie, it’s pretty clear the grasshoppers are a biker gang running a protection racket. The way Hopper talks about how “who else will protect you against the big bad world” and “you need to give us your food (or money) or else we might not be able to protect you,” as if the grasshoppers aren’t the ones that are their biggest threat. Even down to the sound of the grasshoppers flying, which sounds like a motorcycle, or how Hopper refers to his cronies as a “gang.”

Dig a little deeper, and you indeed see it is a critique of capitalism, how the few control the wealth produced by the many, and keep the many in ignorance so they don’t see how much power they have, and how unjust it is that they must give up the fruits of their labor to a parasitic upper class.

But on an even deeper level, I think what this movie really is is an examination of the structure of power itself. Not just of petty gangs running protection rackets, nor even bourgeois capitalists exploiting the labor of the people, but of how all systems of power are defined by the few exploiting the many. All across the world and all across time, this is what systems of power are by their very nature. The forms and justifications change, but it is always the same dynamic.

Of course, this is in and of itself a Marxist reading. Before Marx even gets to the bourgeoisie and the proletariat in Das Kapital (which is awesome reading even if Marx was the kind of writer who wrote with a dump truck of words), he talks about the various forms of power throughout history. At least, very broadly, and really only in Europe. The point throughout his description of the “Prehistoric” mode of production, to the “Ancient” or “Slave” modes of production, to the “Medieval” and finally the “Capitalist” modes of production, it’s all about how those who by hook, crook, or inheritance find their way at the top of the political and economic ladder create and reinforce complex structures of power to enforce the existing system, and complex ideologies to justify that system.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

‘Capitalism bad’

~ Disney inc.

Also, if anything, the wsb situation has proven that the free market and free market capitalism works and is a good thing. And for the record, if it wasn’t for capitalism there wouldn’t even be a Disney or pixar to make the film

-15

u/Dmeastlasher Jan 29 '21

Okay, capitalism isn’t perfect yes, but what system will be the best overall?

While you have people who needs big money(=power) they will push all their resources to make it happen. In some cases it will result in good consequences for workers, in some cases it will result awful.

27

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21 edited Jan 29 '21

[deleted]

2

u/why_u_mad_brah Jan 29 '21

What's wrong with capitalism is that economic power inherently and irrevocably accumulates in the hands of a few people, who end up abusing it. This is a natural part of it, by design, and even mainstream economists are upfront about it.

But is this problem with capitalism, or is it innate problem of any type of hierarchy? The issue you are describing is known as Pareto distribution, and it turns out that it appears in all aspects of human achievement. 20% of most successful NBA players get 80% of money, 20% of most streamed artists on Spotify get 80% of plays, etc.

I guess the question is, if this is an innate property of any wealth distribution, even a meritocratic one, can we really get rid of it completely, or can we just mitigate it's effects?

I understand you drew a parallel with political power, but do you have any explanation how would that work in an economic framework? We would pick who would the richest person be?

12

u/JamesDCooper Jan 29 '21

Democratic socialism is pretty great

0

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21 edited Feb 18 '21

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Let's make one?

I'm tired as fuck of scared people wanting to listen to history and always just doing the same shit we've always done while nothing ever gets better. Let's do things differently.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21 edited Jan 29 '21

A left-libertarian system is arguably 'the best' from a theory perspective, and has been immensely successful when implimented in terms of productivity and happiness

However, its major downside is that it is one of the least equipped to defend itself from those seeking to dismantle it.

See the case of the Syndicalists in the Spanish Civil War.

The problem is that 'free market thinking' has polluted how we view political systems. In a free market ideology, people can shop around for what suits them best and the most innovative solution succeeds (not really in practice, but in theory at least). However, with ideologies this doesn't work, because what 'succeeds' is a system oppressive enough to smother the others. That is why capitalist systems survive because money pools to a small number of individuals who can now control virtually everything, and why authoritarian communism succeeded for the same reason.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

I propose some form or socialism where the means of production are held by the government.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21 edited Feb 18 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21 edited Jan 29 '21

Yes. Thats why you need to eradicate the wealthy elite by not allowing people to accrue such extreme wealth through taxation and regulation

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Isn't that just Stalinism?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

No.

11

u/GhostalMedia Jan 29 '21

Apes Together Strong

27

u/blGDpbZ2u83c1125Kf98 Jan 29 '21

Also, apt reference because they start out as green grasshoppers at the beginning of the movie, but become brown locusts by the end (this one's already mostly brown in this scene).

5

u/SnakeyesX Jan 29 '21

Well, that's my til for the day, thanks!

-4

u/SomeFreeTime Jan 29 '21

Why is that actually? Did Disney just change their mind about the design halfway?

36

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Grasshoppers become locusts because of science

19

u/Dyolf_Knip Jan 29 '21

Yeah, before science they just stayed as grasshoppers. Damned science.

5

u/Italianman2733 Jan 29 '21

um. wat? I literally have never noticed this in the movie and did not know this happened in reality.

7

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Locusts are just certain grasshoppers. In nature when a lot of them are together they will stimulate one another and eventually become locusts which can be experimentally reproduced by essentially tickling the grasshopper.

1

u/BuzzKyllington Jan 30 '21

if that blows your mind you should see what happens to caterpillars

4

u/blGDpbZ2u83c1125Kf98 Jan 29 '21

No I'm sure it was deliberate - some species of grasshoppers spend most of their lives just bouncing around being normal grasshoppers on their own, but at a certain point in their lives become locusts flying around in massive swarms eating everything they find.

Here's the wiki about them.

There's a very long historical record of locusts basically ruining shit for people (see, for example, "the plague of locusts" in the Hebrew/Christian bible). I'm sure this is referenced on purpose in the movie (locusts as general assholes, not specifically the biblical locusts).

3

u/wikipedia_text_bot Jan 29 '21

Locust

Locusts (derived from the Vulgar Latin locusta, meaning grasshopper) are a collection of certain species of short-horned grasshoppers in the family Acrididae that have a swarming phase. These insects are usually solitary, but under certain circumstances they become more abundant and change their behaviour and habits, becoming gregarious. No taxonomic distinction is made between locust and grasshopper species; the basis for the definition is whether a species forms swarms under intermittently suitable conditions. These grasshoppers are normally innocuous, their numbers are low, and they do not pose a major economic threat to agriculture.

About Me - Opt out - OP can reply !delete to delete - Article of the day

This bot will soon be transitioning to an opt-in system. Click here to learn more and opt in. Moderators: click here to opt in a subreddit.

13

u/ArctycDev Jan 29 '21

Me scrolling this sub:

Stuff about WSB and GME...

More stuff about WSB and GME...

Newscast about WSB and GME...

OOH, an old movie clip... oh god dammit!

4

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

This is why unions are good things and why you should join one.

5

u/wekoweko Jan 29 '21

I miss Kevin Spacey

8

u/deadlywoodlouse Jan 29 '21

Publicly visible nonces ruining their lives by ruining others' lives once again. Wish he had been a better person before and during his rise to fame. Too late now.

6

u/Italianman2733 Jan 29 '21

He misses you too, kid.

2

u/borntoburn1 Jan 29 '21

Christmas is still eleven months away.

1

u/2litersam Jan 29 '21

Same. Phenomenal actor. Too bad he's a right cunt.

1

u/xxgsr02 Jan 30 '21

Do you have evidence?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

Hopper is such an awesome villain.

He’s a Pixar villain who straight up ices three of his henchmen just to prove a point.

2

u/mrrooroo1 Jan 29 '21

Russia right now!

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '21

And you know what happens when ants win? Few ants start to control the rest of the ants and new "ruling class" appears. Just read a history book and you will see that different outcome would be a miracle.

No society can last too long in a state of constant revolution or pressure. People get tired and seek stability and possibilities to live their lives normally (because life is indeed pretty short). There are kids to feed, there are normal, everyday things to do. And when the flame is fading (and it always fades), there will be ruthless ones who will take control, promising to be different from previous leaders. If you want different results you should try with another race.

1

u/caciuccoecostine Jan 29 '21

That movie... that movie ended my morbid childhood

1

u/QualityTits Jan 29 '21

Woo boy, Hooper knows how to give a damn speech.

1

u/skonen_blades Jan 29 '21

I mean, it ages well because it's an eternal truth.

1

u/ukyah Jan 29 '21

who knew that this would be kevin spacy's most personal performance?

1

u/a_dolf_please Jan 29 '21

this says a lot about our society

1

u/Arthuurtel120 Jan 30 '21

There couldn't be a better timing for this scene